2021年1月31日日曜日

岡田磨左英(中小企業診断士)さんのツイート




iPhoneから送信

Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer: Baker, Dean: 洋書

Amazon.co.jp: Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer: Baker, Dean: 洋書
https://www.amazon.co.jp/-/en/Dean-Baker/dp/0692793364

Baker, Dean. 2002. “The Run-Up in Home Prices: Is it Real or Is it Another Bubble?” Washington, D.C.: Center for Economic and Policy Research. http://cepr.net/publications/reports/the-run-up-in-home-prices-is-it-real-or-is-it-another-bubble . [リンク切れ]
_____. 2008. Plunder and Blunder: The Rise and Fall of the Bubble Economy. Oakland, Calif.: Berrett-Koehler. 
_____. 2016. “Rents and Inefficiency in the Patent and Copyright System: Is There a Better Route?” Washington, D.C.: Center for Economic and Policy Research. Working Paper. http://cepr.net/images/stories/reports/rents-inefficiency-patents-2016-08.pdf?v=2 .
Baker, Dean and Nicole Woo. 2012. “States Could Save $1.7 Billion Per Year With Federal Financing of Work Sharing.” Washington, D.C.: Center for Economic and Policy Research. http://cepr.net/publications/reports/states-could-save-17-billion-per-year-with-federal-financing-of-work-sharing .[リンク切れ]
4.0 out of 5 stars
その見えざる「神の手」。
Reviewed in Japan on February 18, 2017
2008年の金融危機を予測したことで名を上げた経済学者による新古典派経済学批判本。新古典派批判は読み過ぎて食傷気味なんであるが、タダ読み状態なので思わず手にしてしまった。前半で言及される1997年アジア通貨危機については、竹森俊平氏の『1997年―世界を変えた金融危機』と同じ。しかし、あの通貨危機がなければ現在の韓国の一人当たりのGDPは米国のそれを凌駕していたはずだという著者の言葉には首を傾げる。別に韓国嫌いで言うのではなく(嫌いだが)、高度成長期の数字をマンマextrapolateして未来のGDPが語れるもんではなかろう。
まあそこらへんは目を瞑るとして、中味はだいたい他の新古典派批判本と同じ。十九世紀末、新古典派は「utility」という概念を導入することによって経済学を大転換させる。その前提は以下。「個人はそれぞれのutilityを最大限化すべく動く」。この理論を数学化することによって、新古典派はある仮想現実を誕生させる。「富の分配を政治や価値判断から切り離して解説する経済学ナラティブ」という仮想現実。これによって、それまで盛んに議論された「階級闘争」や「富の再分配」は時代遅れの概念だというレッテルが貼られることになる。
著者は制度学派の観点を交えて、上層部に富が集中するのは政策選択の集積の結果である旨を指摘する。「市場」とは自然における所与の存在ではない。つまり、神が作りしもんではない。人間がルールを設定することによって作られるのが市場である。マクロ経済政策が介在し、それが実行に移される過程で、財産権が規定され(特許、著作権)、契約履行が強制される。1960年代の米国で平均所得の二十倍だったCEOの給料が2015年に276倍まで跳ね上がったのは「市場の手」ではない。「生産性の向上」では説明出来ない。これを正しく何と呼ぶか。「レント(rent)」である。そして「rent」を可能にするルールが粛々と作られ続けたということだ。
以上、みんなどっかで読んできた内容なんで途中で止めようか思ったのだが、飽きてきたところで面白い説が披露され、オヤとなった。失業問題について、それは「意図的な政策選択の結果」であると著者は示唆している。完全雇用で得するのは誰だって話である。労働者である。完全雇用状態は労働者の交渉力を増大させ、富の再分配を促す。では、完全雇用状態で損するのは誰か。金融機関と企業利権所有者だ。金融業者にとってインフレは有り難くないし、企業利権所有者にとって、交渉力の強い労働者たちの出現はイヤである。そして新古典派は、完全雇用状態を目指す財政出動に対して「政府による市場不介入」の原則を掲げ、「市場を歪める」行為としてそれに反対してきたのだった。ちなみに、新古典派経済学者がそこまで透徹した悪人だったのかいうと、私は全くそうは思わない。学業優秀なuseful foolsであり、フツー程度にささやかに貪欲な人たちってくらいではなかろうか(富豪受けする経済学をやると特典がある)。という訳で、永遠に終わらない経済学界における戦いは現在も進行中。
2 people found this helpful



Dean Baker

Dean Baker (born July 13, 1958) is an Americanmacroeconomist and co-founder, with Mark Weisbrot, of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) in Washington, D.C. He is credited as one of the first economists to have identified the 2007–08 United States housing bubble.[3]

Baker grew up in the Lake View neighborhood of Chicago.[4]:205–209

In 1981, Baker graduated from Swarthmore College with a bachelor's degree in history with minors in economics and philosophy. In 1983, he received a master's degree in economics from the University of Denver. In 1988, he received a PhD from the University of Michigan in economics.[2][5]

Career

Baker was a lecturer at the University of Michigan from 1988 to 1989 and an assistant professor of economics at Bucknell University from 1989 to 1992. From 1992 to 1998, he was an economist at the Economic Policy Institute. During this time, he published a paper with Mark Weisbrot in a journal of evolutionary economics.[6]

In 1999, Baker and Weisbrot co-founded the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), an independent, nonpartisan think tank that produces economic research on topics that affect people's lives to contribute to the public debate (social security, healthcare, the national budget), and internationally (global economy, International Monetary Fund, and Latin America policy).[7]

Also in 1999, Baker was a senior research fellow at the Preamble Center for Public Policy.

Baker has consulted with officials from the World Bank and provided testimony to the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress and to the OECD's Trade Union Advisory Council.

From 1996 to 2006, Baker was the author of a weekly online commentary on the economic reporting of The New York Timesand The Washington Post,[8] the Economic Reporting Review. Since 2006, he has continued this commentary on his blog Beat The Press, formerly published at The American Prospect and now on CEPR's website.

2007–08 United States housing bubble

Baker won the Revere Award,[failed verification] along with Steve Keen and Nouriel Roubini, for predicting the crash of the United States housing bubble and the resulting recession, which occurred from 2007 to 2008.[unreliable source?][9] He warned about the coming crisis and the related government policies in multiple articles, op-eds and interviews from 2002 to 2005.[10] Basing his outlook on house price data sets produced by the U.S. government, Baker asserted that there was a bubble in the US housing market in August 2002,[11] well before its peak,[12] and predicted that the bubble's collapse would lead to recession. His prediction for when the recession would start was off by only one quarter.[13][14][15][16][17]

Regarding the housing bubble, Baker was critical of Federal Reserve chair Alan Greenspan.[18][19][20] He has also been critical of the regulatory framework of the real estate and financial industries, the use of financial instruments like collateralized debt obligation, and U.S. politicians and regulators' performance and conflicts of interest.[21]

Baker opposed the U.S. government bailout of Wall Street banks on the basis that the only people who stood to lose from their collapse were their shareholders and high-income CEOs. Of any hypothetical negative effects of not extending the bailout, he said, "We know how to keep the financial system operating even as banks go into bankruptcy and receivership,"[22] citing U.S. government action taken during the S&L crisis of the 1980s.[23]He has ridiculed the U.S. elite for favoring it, asking, "How do you make a DC intellectual look less articulate than Sarah Palin being interviewed by Katie Couric? That's easy. You ask them how failure to pass the bailout will give us a Great Depression."[24]

Rigged

Baker's 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richerclaims that changing how the U.S. economy has been managed over the past 50 years would add between $2 and 3.7 trillion (in constant 2016 dollars) to the U.S. GDP, between 11 and 20 percent. This is summarized in his Table 8-1:[25]

policybillions of 2016 USD% of savings% of GDP
lowhighlowhighlowhigh
full-employment$1,115$2,30056%62%6.0%12.3%
financial sector waste$460$63623%17%2.5%3.4%
patent/copyright monopolies$217$43411%12%1.2%2.3%
corporate governance$90$1455%4%0.5%0.8%
protecting highly paid professions$100$2005%5%0.5%1.1%
Total$1,982$3,71510.6%19.9%

He argues that, for example, focusing more on decreasing unemployment and less on minimizing inflation would primarily benefit the bottom 99%, though the top 1% would get some of those gains.

Similarly, Baker suggests that changes in patent and copyright law over the past 50 years have violated their purpose under the Copyright Clause of the Constitution: "To promote the progress of science and the useful arts". He claims that if the U.S. had spent the same amount on research and media with the results being placed in the public domain, everyone would be better off, with the possible exception of the ultra-wealthy. In particular, the world would be healthier not having to pay patent royalties to U.S. pharmaceuticals.[26]

He also insists that so-called free-trade agreements have exempted MDs and other highly paid professionals, not because of any intrinsic difference in what they do but merely because they have more political power than organized labor.[27]

As a graduate student at the University of Michigan, Baker participated in and was arrested at two sit-ins protesting Representative Carl Pursell's votes for military aid to the Contras. In 1986, Baker defeated Donald Grimes in the Democratic primary and ran unsuccessfully against Pursell to represent Michigan's second Congressional district; his candidacy opposed aid to the Contras.[28][29][30]

Baker is married to economist Helene Jorgensen. They live in Washington, D.C.[31]

Selected articles

Books

  1.  "IDEAS/RePEc: Dean Baker"Research Papers in Economics (RePEc).
  2. a b Baker, Dean (1988). The Logic of Neo-Classical Consumption Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of MichiganOCLC 68299542.
  3.  Wachter, Paul (January 2010). "Bubble Buster: Dean Baker '80 [sic] saw it coming. But if anything, his gloomy forecasts now look conservative"Swarthmore College Bulletin.
  4.  Bain, Ken (2012). What the Best College Students Do. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-06664-9OCLC 821823403.
  5.  "Curriculum Vitae 2014: Dean Baker" (PDF)United States House of Representatives. 2014.
  6.  Baker, Dean; Weisbrot, Mark (December 1994). "The Logic of Contested Exchange". Journal of Economic Issues28(4): 1091–1114. doi:10.1080/00213624.1994.11505613JSTOR 4226888.
  7.  K.S., Jomo; Weisbrot, Mark; James, Deborah (15 April 2011). "The Scorecard on Development, 1960-2010: Closing the Gap?" (Video)Center for Economic and Policy Research.
  8.  Dean Baker, CEPR, 9 June 2003, Reflections on Economic Reporting: Seven Years of the Economic Reporting Review
  9.  [unreliable source?]https://rwer.wordpress.com/2010/05/13/keen-roubini-and-baker-win-revere-award-for-economics-2/
  10.  " Wall Street Economists: A Research Project on Economic Predictions". Archived from the original on 2013-09-01. Retrieved 2013-07-21.
  11.  Baker, Dean (August 2002). "The Run-Up in Home Prices: Is it Real or Is it Another Bubble?"Center for Economic and Policy Research. Retrieved 2012-06-18.
  12.  Reinhart, Carmen M.Rogoff, Kenneth S. (2009). This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 160 (see table 10.8). ISBN 978-0-691-14216-6.
  13.  Robert Manne (May 2009). "The Rudd Essay & the Global Financial Crisis"The Monthly (45).
  14.  Dirk J. Bezemer (2009-06-16). "'No One Saw This Coming': Understanding Financial Crisis Through Accounting Models"(PDF)MPRA Paper No. 15892Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 6, 2015. Retrieved June 16, 2012.
  15.  David Smiley (October 8, 2009). "The Economy in Palliative Care"Progress Magazine.
  16.  Baker, Dean (2006). Recession Looms for the U.S. Economy in 2007 (PDF). CEPR. Retrieved 14 June 2012.
  17.  Isidore, Chris (1 December 2008). "It's official: Recession since Dec. '07". CNNMoney.com. Retrieved 14 June 2012.
  18.  Dean Baker (28 October 2013). "Alan Greenspan owes America an apology"theguardian.com. Retrieved 1 November 2013.
  19.  Gwiazda, Nick (31 October 2013). "Financial Crisis: The Guardian's Dean Baker Is Wrong – Alan Greenspan Owes Nobody An Apology"ibtimes.com. Retrieved 1 November2013.
  20.  Baker, Dean (31 October 2013). "Yes, Alan Greenspan Owes Us a Really Big Apology"Beat the Press. Retrieved 1 November 2013.
  21.  Dean Baker, The Housing Bubble and the Financial CrisisReal-World Economic Review, Issue no. 46, 20 March 2008
  22.  Beat The Press, March 9, 2008
  23.  William Seidman, Who Led Cleanup of S&L Crisis, DiesBloomberg, May 13, 2009
  24.  Huffington Post, September 30, 2008
  25.  p. 215 (p. 222 of 263 in the PDF)
  26.  ch. 5
  27.  ch. 7
  28.  Earle, Rob (22 October 1986). "Baker, Pursell spar in face-to-face debate"The Michigan DailyXCVII (35). pp. 1, 5.
  29.  Cockburn, Alexander (25 October 1986). "Beat the Devil: Dean Baker for Congress"The Nation245 (13): 399.
  30.  "Opinion. August 2 primaries: Vote for progressive candidates"The Michigan DailyXCVIII (11S). 29 July 1988. p. 4.
  31.  Hong, Peter Y. (17 August 2009). "Some saw the housing bubble and sold; trick now is spotting the bottom"Los Angeles Times.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Dean Baker.




10

Dean Baker Predictions - Economic Outlook - Economic Forecast - Wrong Predictions and Correct Predictions

Who Predicted the Financial Crisis The Accuracy and Reliability of Dean Baker's Predictions Can they be relied on for investment decisions?

Dean Baker Predictions

Dean Baker Bio -Dean Baker's Predictions - Wrong Economic Predictions and Right Economic Predictions

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC. He is frequently cited in economics reporting in major media outlets, including the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, CNBC, and National Public Radio. He writes a weekly column for the Guardian Unlimited (UK) and the Huffington Post. His blog, Beat the Press, features commentary on economic reporting. His analyses have appeared in many major publications, including the Atlantic Monthly, the Washington Post, the London Financial Times, and the New York Daily News. He received his Ph.D in economics from the University of Michigan. 

Dean previously worked as a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute and an assistant professor at Bucknell University. He has also worked as a consultant for the World Bank, the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress, and the OECD's Trade Union Advisory Council. He was the author of the weekly online commentary on economic reporting, the Economic Reporting Review (ERR), from 1996 - 2006. 

Expertise: Housing, consumer prices, intellectual property, Social Security, Medicare, trade, employment

Source: CEPR.NET

Politics: Democrat

Note: If readers have comments or corrections, please email them to research {at} economicpredictions.org

Dean Baker Bio - Dean Baker's Predictions - Wrong Economic Predictions and Right Economic Predictions

Wall Street / Economic Predictions

Source & Date

Accuracy 

Comments

The housing enthusiasts, led by Alan Greenspan, insist that the run-up is not a bubble, but rather reflects fundamental factors in the demand for housing.

Instead of warning prospective homebuyers of the risk of buying housing in a bubble-inflated market, Greenspan gave Congressional testimony in the summer of 2002 arguing that there is no such bubble

August 9, 2004
The Nation 
TrueUncannily True

However, his timing was wrong for 5 years of warning before (2002 to 2007). Mr Baker also went quite on the issue from August 2005 indicating that he had doubts about his conclusions after they did not materialize in 5 years.

To his credit most economists and experts ignored the signs until the markets crashed in summer of 2008. The two exceptions are:

Med Jones' (US Economic Risks 2006) andReuters March 11, 2007

Peter Schiff's warning 
December 16, 2006

The Run-Up in Home Prices: Is it Real or Is it Another Bubble? 

A sharp drop in home prices will send this ratio far below its previous low point. Since there are considerable differences in housing markets across the country, if housing prices fall 10 percent nationally, then many regions will see price declines of 20-30 percent.

In the late eighties Japan experienced a simultaneous bubble in its stock market and its real estate market. The collapse of these bubbles has derailed its economy for more than a decade. A similar collapse in the United States, coupled with a poor policy response, could have similar consequences here

July 21, 2005
CEPR
Note: (1)

(original paper 2002)

TrueAlan Greenspan was wrong. Dean Baker was right. Later Alan Greenspan reversed his position on September 18, 2007

Also it remains to be seen if the recovery of 2010 is sustainable or we will enter a decade of stagflation like Japan

Social Security - The Phony Crisis

“Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot have no trouble at all demonstrating that even on highly conservative assumptions about economic growth, the much-forecast insolvency of the Social Security system by about 2030 is most unlikely to happen then, if indeed ever.”—The Economist 

The simple truth is that our economy is generating more than enough income to provide a rising standard of living for future generations while meeting our commitments to Social Security

1999
University of Chicago Press
FalseCNN Fortune reported on Feb 2, 2010 - Next in line for Bail Out
(About Social Security) What Crisis? It Ain't Broke, So No Need To Fix It -January 23, 2005. A Washington Post op-ed by Mark Weisbrot and Dean Baker Jan 23, 2005

University of Chicago Press

FalseCNN Fortune reported on Feb 2, 2010 - Next in line for Bail Out
But that time will come, and the mass uprisings in support of collective bargaining are a great and inspiring start where new leadership and organizing will emergeMarch 12, 20111
Analytical Liberal
To be determined 

Note (1) the date of the paper shows August 2002 but the first independent reference to the prediction is in August 9, 2004. Since that date it is before our cut off date of September 18, 2007 (Alan Greenspan first public warning on PBS News Hour). Therefore it is our conclusion that he did predict warn about the housing bubble and its impact on the economy. In fact he is probably (so far in our research) the first among the experts to warn about the housing bubble and its impact on the economy. The strange thing is after that report. Dr Baker, went silent on the issue. It appears that after his predictions did not come true from 2002 to 2006, he simply dropped the issue. In May 2008 he claimed a credit for predicting the housing bubble. He was right about the crisis and wrong about its timing. Although he appears to be the first to predict the crisis, all the media credit went to Nouriel Roubini and Peter Schiff instead.

Another note. Although Dean Baker warning was observational of price based on statistical and historical correlation. He did not identify the root cause of the housing bubble (subprime mortgages). On the other hand Med Jones and Peter Schiffwere more specific. So is it a lucky guess? Not really, we believe he was close enough in his prediction. He did not need to know the workings of subprime mortgages to know that the housing prices were not sustainable.

Dean Baker Bio - Dean Baker's Predictions - Wrong Economic Predictions and Right Economic Predictions

How accurate are Dean Baker's economic predictions? Can they be relied on for investing?

Despite the fact he foresaw the crisis before anyone else and warned about it, if you followed his predictions you could have lost or made money depending on the time you listened to him. Whether you made money or lost money by or selling your house it depends on the time you listened to his advice. If you sold your house in 2002, 2003, or 2004 you would have lose money. If you listened to him in 2005 you would have saved yourself a lot of money. Dean Bakers went quiet on the topic in 2006 and 2007. The problem with Dean's prediction is timing, while other economists who predicted the crisis warned about it in 2006 & 2007.

Dean was also wrong on the Social Security. He said it was not a problem. 

Research conclusion: Even if an economist is an expert in one sector or area, and was right once or several times, the complexity and number of variables in the economy make it almost impossible to be right all the time. So the value of these predictions is just to become aware of different risks. We only recommend that you follow your own conclusion rather than theirs.

Dean Baker Bio - Dean Baker's Predictions - Wrong Economic Predictions and Right Economic Predictions

Compare Dean Baker's Predictions to 

Med Jones Predictions

Peter Schiff Predictions

Nouriel Roubini Predictions



iPhoneから送信