ーーー
Let's get into it. Questions about policy, econ, government, politics, etc.
How to explain that natl budget doesnt have to be balanced and natl debt criticism
気合いを入れていきましょう。政策、経済、政府、政治などについての質問。
国家予算は均衡する必要がないこと、国の借金批判をどう説明するか
first things first the national
government the federal government is a
currency issuer not a household.
it's not
debt that they have to pay back to
someone else because they create the
dollars so they don't have to take in
more than they put out.
the second thing
i will say is it's very important to
manage you know the amount of money we
have in the economy appropriately.
and so
the national deficit is not a debt it's
simply a record of all of the dollars
that have been put into the economy that
have not been taxed back out.
and so a
deficit for the federal government is a
surplus for all of the people in the
economy those dollars are now in
households and in businesses.
and they're
circulating
when new dollars are added into the
economy if they are going to things that
increase our productive capacity there's
a huge return on those dollars and so
in those cases the spending is justified
if we're at capacity and we spend
inflation becomes a problem when the
federal government adjusts interest
rates.
they either make it more expensive
or less expensive for banks to borrow
money and then banks make it more
expensive or less expensive for people
who want to take out loans to invest in
businesses and start businesses
this is a problem because we are giving
the power to manage the money supply
effectively to private banks we're
giving them way too much power.
and
they're only going to give that money to
people who have started businesses
before who already have capital and have
run businesses what should happen
instead is congress should actually use
their authority to add new dollars into
the economy and run publicly funded
programs to transition to renewable
energy pay people as well paid public
employees.
so that we have a public
option for employment a strong public
option for employment will raise working
conditions and wages everywhere else
because if you have this option where
you're paid well above a living wage you
have good benefits and working
conditions.
now corporations have to
raise their standards in order to
compete with a public employee the last
thing.
i'm gonna say about this one is uh
this will also increase our productive
capacity and has a huge return on
investment also we cannot expect
corporations to wake up one day and say
we're going to transition to renewable
energy no they run on profit motives.
まず最初に、国家政府、連邦政府は、通貨発行者であって、家計ではありません。
連邦政府は通貨を発行しているのであって、家計ではありません。連邦政府がドルを発行しているので、誰かに返済しなければならない借金ではありません。
第二に、経済にあるお金の量を適切に管理することが非常に重要です。
国の赤字は負債ではありません。経済に投入されたドルのうち、税金で払い戻されなかったものを記録したものです。
連邦政府の赤字は、経済界の全ての人々にとっては黒字です。そのドルは、家庭や企業で使われています。
連邦政府の赤字は、経済界の全ての人にとって黒字です。ドルは家庭や企業に入り、循環しています。新しいドルが経済に投入され、生産能力が向上すれば、そのドルには大きな見返りがあるので、その場合の支出は正当化されます。
連邦政府が金利を調整すると、銀行がお金を借りるのが高くなったり安くなったりします。そうすると銀行は、事業投資や起業のために融資を受けようとする人々の金利を高くしたり安くしたりします。これは、通貨供給を効果的に管理する権限を民間銀行に与えていることが問題です。銀行に与える権限が大きすぎるのです。
この問題は、民間銀行に資金供給を効果的に管理する権限を与えていることです。民間銀行は、すでに資本を持ち、事業を営んでいる起業経験者にしか資金を与えようとしません。その代わりに、議会はその権限を使って、経済に新しいドルを加え、再生可能エネルギーに移行するための公的資金によるプログラムを運営すべきです。
雇用のための強力な公的オプションがあれば、労働条件や賃金はどこでも上がります。生活賃金をはるかに上回る賃金が支払われ、福利厚生や労働条件が充実しているからです。
企業は公務員と競争するために基準を上げなければならないのです。
また、企業がある日突然目を覚まして、再生可能エネルギーに移行すると言い出すとは思えません。
Jessica (Ka) L. Burbank, MPAさんのツイート 2022
~~~
yeah i i agree with jank.
i am also stunned by it can you imagine this origin story getting broken up with this this way i love you but i really want to be a landlord she's going to be an unstoppable organizer i cannot imagine what she would do next but it's sad that economic hardship is such a strain on love and relationships in our society it's definitely late stage capitalism.
and it's just sad but if material conditions are determining the relationship did you really love them in the first place maybe not i think what we're experiencing here is very few people do real love anymore a lot of people that i meet are caught up in the idea of being in a thing getting into a relationship a lot of people are in relationships and then they post it all on social media and then you talk to them in person.
and they're terribly unhappy in sweden there's really interesting research about people getting married at lower rates when they remove the tax benefit of getting married.
and so i think it's a problem that love is dying and i'm going to blame capitalism.
exactly yeah think about it brandon had a chance to
しかし、経済的な困難が愛や人間関係に影響を与えるのは悲しいことです。
そして悲しいことですが、もし物質的な条件で関係が決まるのなら、そもそも本当にその人を愛していたのか、というとそうではないかもしれません。
私たちが経験しているのは、本当の恋愛をする人がもうほとんどいないということです。私が会う人の多くは、恋愛をするという考えにとらわれています。多くの人が恋愛をし、それをソーシャルメディアに投稿し、そして実際に会って話をします。
スウェーデンでは、結婚することによる税制上の優遇措置を取り除くと、結婚する人の割合が低くなるという興味深い調査結果があります。
だから、愛が失われつつあるのは問題で、私は資本主義のせいにしようと思っています。
yeah i i agree with jank.
i am also stunned by it can you imagine this origin story getting broken up with this this way.
i love you but i really want to be a landlord.
she's going to be an unstoppable organizer.
i cannot imagine what she would do next but it's sad that economic hardship is such a strain on love and relationships in our society it's definitely late stage capitalism.
and it's just sad but if material conditions are determining the relationship did you really love them in the first place maybe not.
i think what we're experiencing here is very few people do real love anymore a lot of people that i meet are caught up in the idea of being in a thing getting into a relationship a lot of people are in relationships and then they post it all on social media and then you talk to them in person.
and they're terribly unhappy in sweden there's really interesting research about people getting married at lower rates when they remove the tax benefit of getting married.
and so i think it's a problem that love is dying and i'm going to blame capitalism.
私も唖然としました。この原点がこんな風に壊れていくなんて想像できますか?
愛してる、でも本当は大家さんになりたい。
彼女は止められない組織人になりそうです。
この先どうするのか想像もつきませんが、経済的な困難が恋愛や人間関係に負担をかける社会というのは悲しいですね。
そして悲しいことですが、もし物質的な条件で関係が決まるのなら、そもそも本当にその人を愛していたのか、というとそうではないかもしれません。
私たちが経験しているのは、本当の恋愛をする人がもうほとんどいないということです。私が会う人の多くは、恋愛をするという考えにとらわれています。多くの人が恋愛をし、それをソーシャルメディアに投稿し、そして実際に会って話をします。
スウェーデンでは、結婚することによる税制上の優遇措置を取り除くと、結婚する人の割合が低くなるという興味深い調査結果があります。
だから、愛が失われつつあるのは問題で、私は資本主義のせいにしようと思っています。
「愛が死につつあるのは問題だと思うし、資本主義のせいにするつもりだ」
Can you imagine this origin story getting broken up with this this way I love you but I really wanna be a landlord organizer.
I cannot imagine what she would do next shipper such a strain on relationships in our society.
it's definitely weird stage capitalism conditions are determining the relationship.
did you really love them in the first place?
I think here is very few people do really love anymore.
a lot of people that I need or caught up in the idea of being in a thing getting into a relationship a lot of people are in relationships.
and they posted on social media and then you talk to them in person.
and they're terribly unhappy in Sweden there's really interesting research about Reese when they remove the tax benefit of getting married.
and so I think it's a problem that love is dying and I'm gonna blame capitalism.
この原点がこんな風に壊れてしまうなんて、想像できますか?
愛してる、でも本当は地上げ屋になりたいんだ。
私は彼女が次に何をするか想像することはできませんshipperこのような社会の人間関係の負担。
資本主義的な条件によって関係が決まるのは確かに変だ。
そもそも本当に好きだったのか?
本当に愛している人はもうほとんどいないと思う。
多くの人は、自分が必要とする人、あるいは恋愛に巻き込まれることで、多くの人が恋愛をするようになりました。
ソーシャルメディアに投稿し、実際に会って話をする。
スウェーデンでは、結婚の税制優遇を外した場合のリースについて、実に興味深い研究結果があります。
愛が失われつつあるのは問題です 資本主義のせいにするつもりです。
I agree with Jake. I'm almost done via can you imagine this origin story,
getting broken up with this this way I love you but I really want to be your landlord organizer.
I cannot imagine what she went through economic hardship is such a strain on our relationship is definitely waves determining the relationship did you really love them in the first place.
I think here is very few people do real love anymore people that I mean being in a thing getting into a relationship a lot of people are in relationships.
and then they post it on social media and then you talk to them in person.
and they're terribly unhappy in Sweden there's really interesting research about people getting married and lower rates when they remove the tax benefit of getting married.
and so I think it's a problem that love is dying and I'm gonna blame capitalism.
私はジェイクに同意する。私はほとんどを経由しているあなたは、この起源の物語を想像することができます。
私はあなたを愛していますが、私は本当に家主になりたい、この方法で別れてしまった。
私は彼女が経済的苦難を経てきたものを想像することはできません私たちの関係にそのような緊張は間違いなく関係を決定する波であるあなたは本当に最初の場所でそれらを愛していました。
私はここで思うのは、もう本当の愛をする人はほとんどいないということです。
そして、それをソーシャルメディアに投稿し、実際に会って話をする。
スウェーデンでは、結婚すると税制上の優遇措置がなくなるため、結婚率が下がるという興味深い調査結果があります。
愛が失われつつあるのは問題です 資本主義のせいにするつもりです。
私はジェイクに同意します。
こんな最初のストーリーを想像できますか?
こんな風に別れた話です。愛してるけど本当は君の家主になりたいんだ。
彼女が経済的困難を経験したことは想像できません。
私たちの関係へのそのような負担は、そもそもあなたが本当に彼らを愛していたかどうかを決定する方法であることは間違いありません.
ここでは、本当の愛を持つ人はもうほとんどいないと思います。つまり、多くの人が関係を築いているということです。
そして彼らはそれをソーシャルメディアに投稿し、あなたは彼らと直接話します。
そして彼らはスウェーデンで非常に不幸です 人々が結婚し、結婚の税制優遇措置を取り除くと税率が下がるという興味深い研究があります。
だから、愛が死につつあるのは問題だと思いますが、私はそれを資本主義のせいにするつもりです。
and so I think it's a problem that load is dying and I'm gonna Brandon had a chance to
私はジェイクに同意する私はほとんどを介して行われますこのように私はあなたを愛しているが、私は本当に家主の主催者になりたい、彼女は経済的苦難を通過したものを想像することはできませんが、私たちの関係に負担を決定する波ですあなたは本当に最初の場所でそれらを愛していますか私はここに非常に少数の人々はもう本当の愛を行っていると思う私は、関係に入っていることを意味します。多くの人が恋愛をして、それをソーシャルメディアに投稿し、そして実際に話してみると、彼らはひどく不幸である スウェーデンでは、人々が結婚することについての本当に興味深い研究があり、結婚することの税制上の利点を取り除くと税率が低くなります だから、私は負荷が死んでいることが問題だと思う 私はつもりブランドンはチャンスを持っていたよ
あなたはこの原点を想像することができます このように私はあなたを愛していますが、私は本当に地上げ屋になりたい 彼女は次に何をするか想像することはできません 荷主 私たちの社会では、このような関係の緊張は確かに奇妙です 資本主義の条件は関係を決定している あなたは本当に最初の場所でそれらを愛していました 私はここに非常に少数の人々はもう本当に愛していないと思う 多くの人々は、私が必要とするもの、または物事の関係にあるという考えに巻き込まれた多くの人が恋愛をしていて、ソーシャルメディアに投稿して、実際に会って話をすると、ひどく不幸になっている スウェーデンでは、結婚の税制優遇を廃止した場合のリースに関する非常に興味深い研究がある だから、愛が死んでいくのは問題だと思うし、私はまさに資本主義のせいにしようと思う
飯野うスウェーデン論
2001
所得課税における一般基礎控除が8,800Krから 1 万Krに引き上げられた。また年金生活者に対する特別の基礎控除が結婚した人については1,100Kr引き上げられて51,000Krに、単身者については1,200Kr引き上げられて57,500Krになった。
2005
子供のいる結婚生活者や同棲者の財産税の課 税最低限度額が300万Krに引き上げられるとい う形で減税が行われた。
DeepLで翻訳しました (https://www.deepl.com/app/?utm_source=ios&utm_medium=app&utm_campaign=share-translation
- @JessicaLBurbank #tytlive
以下ではない
Conservatives Crying Tidal Wave Of Tears Over Biden's Strong Speech
that is a video where biden of course is hitler if you're not understanding the historic reference there that was chaired by marjorie green marjorie green of course is a part of the republican party a party that is spending all of today saying that declaring them semi-fascists or a potential threat to democracy is out of bounds but turning joe biden into hitler and spreading that in social media is apparently uh fully acceptable um that's that doesn't honestly even stand out from other right wingers they are losing their ever-loving minds over this biden speech here's a little mashup for you the republican party today is dominated by donald trump and the migrant and that is a threat to this country yeah they're a threat says the guy with the blood-red nazi background and marines standing behind him the imagery there was almost satanic with that blood red lighting and the two marines behind him it was just insane the idea he would give such a massively partisan speech that degraded half of the country in the i don't know any democrat that can stand by that and say that that was okay this speech is easily the most disgraceful speech from a president in recent decades it is horrifying how he is against every single american who didn't vote for him president biden tonight gave the speech of a dictator in the style of a dictator in the visual of a dictator using the words of a dictator this was his enemies of the state speech and like every other radical marxist accused his opponents of being fascist while he engages in repressive i think that baby voldemort's got a good point there um no it's ridiculous if it sounds like they did not listen to the same speech as you it's because they didn't listen to the speech let's be very clear about that they weren't actually responding to it tucker carlson you know while he's up next to me let off his show saying we're gonna dive deep into biden's speech and then went more than half of the run time not playing a single second of it he had thoughts about it but he literally was not watching it it was being broadcast while he was live and yet he had many thoughts about the speech that he wasn't actually listening to these are of course all right wing commentators that sat happily by for all of these debate performances campaign speeches and rallies from donald trump mocking the physically disabled pitching all democrats as horrible people and then not just doing not just saying things but doing things actually working to strip away rights putting religious ideologues on the supreme court having as your only domestic infrastructure goal uh the creation of a multi-billion dollar wall to keep out the people you label illegals casually so spare me honestly the supposed tears stephen miller would have loved every bit of that if it had been delivered by trump it just wouldn't have had any of the sting of actually identifying a true threat to democracy in that case yeah i think half the people in those but know of course that they're playing games and and uh and stephen miller uh said one thing that is true he said look for people who want to be authoritarian is to call their opponents what they are which is ironically exactly what he was doing in that appearance uh he was an integral part of donald trump's um presidency and he pushed a fake elector scheme which would have literally done a coup against our democracy uh he pushes for an authoritarian leader in donald trump and then he says oh look biden's doing it and then he tells you his own strategy as if biden believes it right so that was really meta um but i think half of them guys are genuinely right wingers have a sense of entitlement in this country the democrats and the left are not allowed to fight back that they could say anything they want about democrats they could say that their child uh baby killers and criminals and rapists and the worst people say anything the most outrageous things about democrats but if a democrat ever says anything about republicans they go oh my god they have offended half the country well how about when you were calling half the country baby killers and and all the other unbelievable things you've said over the last 40 years they feel like no no i have a right to do that i have a right to punch you in the face but you don't ever have a right to talk back to me because i'm in charge now super sad day for the we do get to talk back to you you're not and and they've gotten smug and used to that entitlement because democrats have not fought back in 40 goddamn years when biden half fights back this is not a bunch of majority of republicans are wonderful people the majority of republicans my ass they're wonderful people they're awful people right but he says the majority are good but less than are you know are problematic because they just try to overturn our democracy and they're like this is the most divisive speech in decades you never saw donald trump's speech they're just amazing yeah it's amazing to watch them try and brand run-of-the-mill neo-liberal democracy as fascism which might be something that would be kind of easy to do if we were living in a country where most people were to the left of neoliberal democracy but when we have actual fascists on the far right by comparison it's not so easy to do but i bet people will watch these news segments not watch the speech and just believe them at their word and that's really scary uh it's not really about the lighting in the speech they're trying to frame biden as an authoritarian leader because he says he's going to uphold elections and and make sure that public resources sometimes go to things that benefit people and sometimes regulate corporations and to us on the actual left that want to see the actual will of the people reflected in their government the speech doesn't go far enough and that's very clear and it's very run-of-the-mill neo-liberal democracy to the point that he's still calling the united states a democratic experiment and we're the country that's a beacon on the hill uh and he makes it a point to very clearly call out political violence which is is the same rhetoric that they push during the black lives matter movement we know that in the united states we've had a lot of one-sided state violence and when people stand up to that uh things like the destruction of property is framed as terribly violent revolutionary behavior when in reality it's a response to people being murdered by the state so biden's speech was not terribly far right it was pretty much down the middle calling for unity by just saying you know we need to actually have fair elections not making any big bold promises other than to transition to renewable energy but that wasn't really backed with any details of the plan so it's insane to watch them brand this speech as extremists when it is the most purely centrist thing i've heard in a long time yeah and when we when we respond with like have they been listening to donald trump you might come away if you haven't been following every step along the way that oh so they're saying that i i guess everybody does it that's very clearly not what we're saying what biden is doing is not throwing substance free slurs at the other side he's identifying the actual intent of this movement on the right they do want to end democracy perhaps not via coup next time that would be nice but they definitely want your vote to not actually count for anything even less than it does now that is actually true when donald trump stands on the stage and appeals to the q anon crowd or you know has his crowd chant lock her up about conspiracy theories about hillary clinton that it's not the same thing as accurately uh describing what a political movement is trying to accomplish so this is not what about ism they're very different things um but i want to give you just a couple more responses to it it came not just on he who has always been a very big critic of trump when he goes too far uh tweeted that was the most demagogic outrageous and divisive speech i have ever seen from an american president i apologize if i'm not really selling the ben shapiro thing imagine that i've slowed it down by about two times uh joe biden essentially declared all those who oppose him and his agenda enemies of the republic truly shameful uh no he didn't do that and you know he didn't do that because you said essentially and the reason you wrote essentially in your tweet is because you know that donald trump literally called groups in america the enemy of the people hundreds of times and you never raised a single objection to it thus the flaccid essentially in your tweet but donald trump also posted about it not on twitter because he's not allowed on there and that remains fun to this day saying if you look at the words and meaning of the awkward and angry biden speech night he threatened america including with the possible use of military force he must be insane or suffering from late stage dementia and person woman man camera tv uh yes he's threatening with military i do we seriously have to respond to whether biden was threatening to deploy the military against the american people that isn't actually what he was doing now donald trump frequently fantasized about putting the military in the streets whether for ostentatious north korean-esque uh military parades or to crush social justice protests again it is all projection undiluted oh we have a jackson here so what what i'm seeing from all the them basically saying how dare they don't they know their place they're supposed to just have us pummel them and just sit there and take it and tell america how great we are no sorry for the first time joe biden hasn't done that that's what gave a speech that went a quarter of the way to being honest and guys look when we talk about threat to democracy so a couple of the commentators there that you saw with your own eyes and then donald trump talked about a call that bind was doing a call to war and and uh you threatened to use military force did he actually say any of that in the speech absolutely not you could watch the speech for yourself you see that there's none of it it's just totally made up but it is what we talked about earlier it is projection right so they donald trump literally said go down to the capitol uh you know when he heard that that his own vice president might be murdered he said he didn't mind so there's been a literal call to violence from trump over and over and over again lindsey graham talking about how there's going to be riots in the streets if you dare hold trump accountable etc they're obviously projecting and did we always say that donald trump was a threat to democracy like that we say it to john's point that we say without substance just like they say without substance absolutely not go back and see during definitely definitely wanted trump to lose and i did a hundred loser donald segments did i ever say that he was a threat to democracy no you know why because at that point i didn't know he was a threat to democracy i just thought he was an incompetent evil stupid immoral guy okay that shouldn't be anywhere near power but i didn't think he was gonna he wasn't gonna leave office then he was gonna ask his uh a crowd to do a riot maybe hang his vice i didn't think any of that because i hadn't seen an inclination towards that now we see it so you actually point out facts matter or they matter but cnn will tell you now because they have a new republican owner a 50 50. i can't tell and in fact they did do that several different people today on cnn talking about oh biden's gone too far he's such a meanie i can't believe he's doing that so it's absolutely absurd and uh and and the talk about enemies of the they're kind of rubbing it in your face so both trump and and stephen miller you talking about especially stephen miller in that clip that you saw he knows he wrote the lines about democrats and media being enemies of the state when he was running for donald trump so he goes on there and winks to the to the people who know but he knows the audience doesn't know anything because they've been brain body washed by right-wing media and they don't know a goddamn thing so he goes oh biden is calling for his opponents to be wink i can't believe they're offending but the audience doesn't know he's winking they really think this is the only thing they're saying if you watch tucker cross's segment remember his entire audience is 100 brainwashed you would have thought that it was hitler's speech and that biden was saying i'm going to come and he said he made it seem like they were the biden was going to send soldiers to your house and maybe even attack you physically attack you you they they think that binds about to march in the goddamn streets with the military and by the way what happens at the end of right-wingers super large thing i would say comparatively globally americans have been pretty comfortable we haven't had relative political instability and the idea that we could become the kind of country where democracy fails and we are terribly politically unstable to the point that there's violence in the streets scares a lot of americans not only that joe biden in this speech pointed out how the right has taken many of our basic rights and freedoms away via their control of the supreme court and so what mainstream media especially fox is trying to do here is get people to not watch the speech because they don't want people to hear those narratives they are afraid but i think it could backfire because they're saying all of this crazy stuff about what happened in the speech but the clips don't reflect any of that crazy stuff happening so they're effectively teasing the speech and more people might end up actually tuning in to the speech because of it yeah that's also true yes um it's super last thing tucker carlson also told you that the uh the people at the george floyd protests were gonna march into your house and pull you out of your beds he said the same thing effectively about the like mandatory vaccination squads that we're gonna come out they just keep saying it and they keep gobbling it up it's weird how that works thanks for watching the young troops really appreciate it another way to show support is through youtube memberships you'll get to interact with us more there's live chat emojis badges you've got emojis of me anna john jr so those are super fun but you also get playback of our exclusive member-only shows and specials right after they air so all that all you gotta do is click that join button right underneath the
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿