2022年8月27日土曜日

Augustus Hawkins (1907~2007)


OVERSIGHT ON THE FULL EMPLOYMENT AND BALANCED GROWTH ACT MONDAY, MAY 19, 1980 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR, 
New York, N.Y. 
The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:30 a.m., 26 Federal Plaza, New York, N.Y., Hon. Augustus F. Hawkins (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. 
 Members present: Representatives Hawkins and Weiss. 
 Staff present: Susan Grayson, staff director; Clemon Williams, legislative associate; Carole Schanzer, administrative assistant; and Beth Buehlmann, minority legislative associate. 
 Mr. HAWKINS. The House Subcommittee on Employment Oppor- tunities is called to order. 
 The subcommittee's hearing in New York City this morning is a continuation of our oversight on the employment impact of current and proposed economic policies. 
 It is significant to note that the economic policies of the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act were developed after the most thorough public discussion and debate. Yet these economic policy mandates, which were enacted into law less than 2 years ago, are being openly violated and completely ignored with minimal public awareness or outcry. 
 It is my hope that this series of public hearings which the subcommittee will conduct on this issue will serve to increase public awareness that the act is being violated and that there are constructive alternatives to the current economic policies. 
 While the Full Employment Act sets an unemployment goal of not more than 4 percent overall by 1983 and mandates that interim policies be directed toward that goal, we are now experi- encing 7 percent unemployment nationwide with some economists forecasting up to 12 percent, an increase brought about through deliberate economic policies. 
 While the Full Employment Act explicitly prohibits using unem- ployment as a tradeoff to reduce inflation, this administration has consciously engineered a recession in the mistaken belief that this is the only way to beat inflation.

 
デービッド・スタイン

オーガスタス・ホーキンス下院議員は、パウエルが行っていることをハンフリー=ホーキンス法の下で違法と見ていたことを定期的に思い出している--彼が書いた法律だ pic.twitter.com/x8CjIH3WXH
 
2022/08/27 2:19
 
 
https://twitter.com/davidpstein/status/1563214506645282816?s=21


完全雇用・均衡成長法に関する監視 1980年5月19日(月 
下院、教育労働委員会雇用機会小委員会。
ニューヨーク、N.Y. 
小委員会は通知に従い、午前9時30分、ニューヨーク州ニューヨークのフェデラルプラザ26番地で開かれ、オーガスタス・F・ホーキンズ氏(小委員会議長)が議長を務めた。 
 出席議員 ホーキンス、ワイス両議員 
 スタッフ出席 スーザン・グレイソン スタッフディレクター クレモン・ウィリアムズ 立法担当補佐官 キャロル・シャンツァー 事務担当補佐官 ベス・ビューマン マイノリティ立法担当補佐官 
 ホーキンス君 下院雇用機会小委員会を開会します。 
 今朝ニューヨークで行われた小委員会の公聴会は、現在および提案されている経済政策の雇用への影響に関する監視を継続するものである。 
 完全雇用・均衡成長法」の経済政策は、最も徹底した国民的議論と討論を経て策定されたものであることは、重要なことである。しかし、法律として制定されてから2年も経っていないこれらの経済政策の任務は、公然と違反され、国民の認識や反発もほとんどないまま完全に無視されているのである。 
 この問題について小委員会が実施する一連の公聴会が、法が破られ、現在の経済政策に建設的な代替案があることを一般に認識させるのに役立つことを期待している。 
 完全雇用法は、1983年までに全体の失業率を4%以下にするという目標を設定し、暫定的な政策をその目標に向けることを義務づけているが、現在、全国で7%の失業率を経験し、一部のエコノミストは12%にまで上昇すると予測しており、意図的な経済政策がもたらしたものである。 
 完全雇用法は、インフレを抑えるためのトレードオフとして失業を用いることを明確に禁じているが、この政権は、インフレに打ち勝つ唯一の方法であると勘違いして、意識的に不況を演出しているのである。

Interview with Augustus Hawkins for "The Great Depression" 1992







Augustus Hawkins (1907~2007)- Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_Hawkins ★

オーガスタス・ホーキンス - ウィキペディア
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_Hawkins

オーガスタス・ホーキンス

オーガスタス・ホーキンス
オーガスタス・フリーマン・ホーキンス.jpg
のメンバー
米国衆議院
カリフォルニアから
オフィスで
1963年1月3日~1991年1月3日
先行するエドガー・W。Hiestand (制限付き)
成功するマキシン・ウォーターズ
選挙区第21区(1963-1975)
第29区(1975-1991)
のメンバーカリフォルニア州議会
第62区から
オフィスで
1935年1月7日~1963年1月3日
先行するフレデリック・マディソン・ロバーツ
成功するトム・ウェイト
個人情報
生まれた
オーガスタス・フリーマン・ホーキンス

1907年8月31日
シュリーブポートルイジアナ州、アメリカ
死んだ2007年11月10日(100歳)
ベセスダ、メリーランド州、アメリカ
政党民主党の
配偶者ペガ・スミス(1945-1966)
エルシー・ホーキンス(1977-2007)
教育カリフォルニア大学ロサンゼルス校(BA)

オーガスタス・フリーマン・ホーキンス(1907年8月31日-2007年11月10日)は、1935年から1963年までカリフォルニア州議会米国に務めた民主党のアメリカの政治家です。1963年から1991年までの衆議院。彼のキャリアの過程で、ホーキンスは300以上の州法と連邦法を執筆し、最も有名なのは1964年の公民権法タイトルVIIと1978年のハンフリー・ホーキンス完全雇用法です。彼は教育と失業の終結へのコミットメントで「沈黙の戦士」として知られていた。1]

コンテンツ

  • 1 早期および私生活
  • 2 政治的キャリア
    • 2.1です。 州議会
    • 2.2です。 米国議会
  • 3 後世
  • 4 レガシー
  • 5 参照
  • 6 参考文献
  • 7 外部リンク

早期および私生活

ホーキンスはルイジアナ州シュリーブポートで、5人の子供の末っ子で、ニャンザ・ホーキンスとハティ・フリーマンに生まれました。1918年、家族はロサンゼルスに引っ越した。2][3]ホーキンスは1926年にジェファーソン高校を卒業し、1931年にカリフォルニア大学ロサンゼルス校で経済学学士号を取得しました。[4] 卒業後、彼は土木工学を勉強する予定でしたが、大恐慌の財政的制約はこれを不可能にしました。これは彼の政治への関心と生涯にわたる教育への献身に貢献した。卒業後、ホーキンスは兄と一緒に不動産会社を経営し、政府を学んだ。5] カリフォルニア州議会に勤務している間、ホーキンスは1945年8月28日にペガ・アデリン・スミスと結婚した。スミスは1966年に亡くなり、ホーキンスは後に1977年にエルシー・テイラーと結婚した。6] 議会を引退した後、彼の妻がそれを好み、彼女の2ヶ月後に彼の死までそこに住んでいたので、彼はワシントン地域に滞在しました。[2]

混血の祖先のアフリカ系アメリカ人であるホーキンスは非常に色白で、イギリスの祖父に似ていたと伝えられている。5] 彼の人生を通して、彼はしばしば白人として合格することを拒否したが、単に白人の祖先であると考えられていた。[7][2]

政治的キャリア

ホーキンスとジョン・F大統領1962年のケネディ

州議会

オーガスタス・ホーキンスは、黒人代表が非常に限られていた時代にカリフォルニアで奉仕し、「政治権力を得るための黒人戦略は、白人政治家に投票し、ロビー活動を通じて民主党内で影響力を行使することでした。」[8] ホーキンスとは別に、「ロサンゼルスの黒人には、市、郡、州、または連邦政府に他の政治代表者がいませんでした。」[8]

ホーキンスは、アフリカ系アメリカ人による共和党から民主党へのより一般的な変化の一部でした。9] アフリカ系アメリカ人の大半とは異なり、彼はフランクリン・Dを支持した1932年のルーズベルトの大統領選挙運動。ホーキンスは、米国全体で非常に人気があったニューディール、特にアフリカ系アメリカ人コミュニティなどの措置を支持した。ルーズベルトは1936年に黒人投票に勝った最初の民主党大統領になるだろう。1934年、ホーキンスは社会主義者であるアプトン・シンクレアのより物議を醸す1934年のカリフォルニア州知事選挙を支持した。シンクレアは負けたが、ホーキンスはサリー・ヘミングスの曾孫であり、トーマス・ジェファーソン大統領であり、カリフォルニア州議会で最初のアフリカ系アメリカ人である共和党フレデリック・マディソン・ロバーツを破った。ホーキンスは、彼の出発が彼の前のロバーツのような最も上級メンバーである頃には、1935年から1963年まで民主党議員を務めていました。

ホーキンス地区は主にラテン系アメリカ人とアフリカ系アメリカ人だった。議会在任中、彼は「公正な住宅法、公正な雇用慣行法、低コストの住宅および障害保険法、家事労働者に対する労働者補償規定」などの法律を導入しました。[2][5] 教育とともに、雇用と住宅の公正な慣行がホーキンスの主な原因となった。しかし、当時、彼は民主党からこれらの措置に対する支持をほとんど受けてこなれませんでした。9] それにもかかわらず、彼は連邦資金を受け取った建築業者による差別を禁止する公正な住宅法を含むいくつかの措置を可決することができました。[10] ホーキンスはまた、1940年、1944年、1960年の全国大会の代表であり、1944年にカリフォルニア州の選挙人団大統領選挙人でした。1958年、ホーキンスはカリフォルニア州知事に次いでで2番目に強力な地位であったカリフォルニア州議会議長になることを求めた。ホーキンスはラルフ・Mに敗れた。ブラウンですが、強力な規則委員会の委員長に任命されました。11][2] ホーキンスが成功していたら、彼はカリフォルニア史上初のアフリカ系アメリカ人スピーカーになっていただろう。ウィリー・ブラウンは1980年にこの偉業を成し遂げるだろう。1962年、ホーキンスはジョン・Fの支持を得て、ロサンゼルス中心部を含む新しく作成された過半数の黒人議会地区を獲得しました[12]。ケネディ、ホーキンスは予備選挙と総選挙で簡単に勝った。選挙後、ホーキンスは「長年の奉仕で議会で最も古い男から議会の新入生にギアをシフトするようなものだ」と述べた。[13]

米国議会

1963年から1991年まで、ホーキンスは議会でロサンゼルス郡南部をカバーするカリフォルニアの第21地区(1963-1975)と29区(1975-1991)を代表しました。ホーキンスは一貫して選出され、民主党に優しい地区の投票の80%以上が選出された。彼はミシシッピ川の西に選出された最初の黒人代表だった。5]

ホーキンスはリンドン・B大統領の強力な支持者だった。ジョンソン偉大な社会。議会でのキャリアの早い段階で、彼は雇用機会均等委員会を設立した1964年の公民権法のタイトルVIIを含む法律を執筆しました。ホーキンスは公民権の強力な支持者であり、1964年にアフリカ系アメリカ人の有権者登録を提唱するために南部をツアーしました。14]

1965年の議決権法が法律に署名されてから5日後、ワッツ暴動はホーキンス地区で起こった。それは1960年代に最初の人種暴動だった。ホーキンスは議会の同僚に貧困撲滅資金を増やすよう促したが、暴力は容認しなかった。15] 彼の明るい肌と人種間の緊張の高まりのために、ホーキンスは暴動の直後に彼の地区を訪れたときに注意しなければならなかった。[7]暴動は、特に公正な住宅をめぐってグレートソサエティを停滞させました。グレートソサエティの法律の恩恵を受けた黒人は、特に白人の隣に住むことが許された場合、アメリカの「法と秩序」に有害であると非難されました。公正な住宅は依然としてアメリカでは不人気な問題でした。民主党上院議員候補のピエール・サリンジャーは、1964年にリンドン・ジョンソンが反公民権バリー・ゴールドウォーターに対する大統領勝利を破った中で唯一の共和党のピックアップをマークし、この問題でカリフォルニアの共和党のジョージ・マーフィーに敗れた。投票権法が署名された後、オープン住宅改革はグレートソサエティリストの次に見えたが、ワッツ暴動はそれを保留にした。1968年のマーティン・ルーサー・キング・ジュニア暗殺後まで渡されなかった

ベトナム戦争中、ホーキンスは当初ジョンソン大統領に同意した。1964年、戦争は大社会を弱体化させ、米国は「私たちの生活様式を他の人に課すことはできない」と主張した。[16] 南ベトナムがアメリカの支援なしに生き残るのに十分な安定ではないことが明らかになったとき、ホーキンスは戦争に対する批判を高めた。1970年6月に南ベトナムをツアーした後、ホーキンスと仲間の民主党下院議員ウィリアム・アンダーソンは、南ベトナムの囚人の「残酷で非人道的な扱いを非難する」よう議会に促す下院決議を起草した。[5]アンダーソンとホーキンスは他の9人の議員と一緒に南ベトナムを訪れていましたが、彼らはコンソン島の民間南ベトナム刑務所を訪問した唯一の2人でした。17] 2人の下院議員はまた、ニクソン大統領に刑務所を調査し、「さらなる劣化と死を防ぐ」ために独立したタスクフォースを送るよう圧力をかけた。[18]

アメリカコレクションのホーキンスの肖像画衆議院

ホーキンスは議会ブラックコーカスの創設メンバーであり、最初の任期(1971年から1973年)に副議長を務めました。5][2]ホーキンスは、アダム・クレイトン・パウエル・ジュニア、ビル・クレイ、ロン・デラムズなどの他のアフリカ系アメリカ人のように議会をいじめ説教壇として使用するのではなく、法律に焦点を当てることを好んだため、CBCで重要な役割を果たしませんでした。ホーキンスは、「公民権運動にはより明確な思考と露出症の少ない」が必要だと主張しました。[19] この間、ホーキンスは1906年にテキサス州ブラウンズビルで公の騒乱で誤って告発され陸軍から除隊した第25歩兵連隊の170人の黒人兵士への名誉除隊を回復することに成功しました。[20] 他のCBCメンバーとは異なり、彼は議題が法律に可決される可能性を高めるために、組織労働白人民族に協力を求めました。[21] 1980年、ホーキンスはCBCを「85%のソーシャル、15%のビジネス」と批判した。[22]

公民権法のタイトルVIIとは別に、ホーキンスが通過に尽力した法律には、1974年の少年司法および非行防止法、若い犯罪者に特定の保護を提供する法律、1978年の包括的な雇用訓練法、および妊娠に基づく女性に対する差別を防止することを目的とした1978年の妊娠障害法があり、ホーキンスは「アメリカの労働力における真の平等が幻想以上のものであり、妊娠が23][24]ホーキンスは、1977年にミネソタ州の伝説的なヒューバート・ハンフリー上院議員と一緒にホーキンスが後援した1978年のハンフリー・ホーキンス完全雇用法で最もよく知られています。この法案は、米国政府に完全な雇用を提供するという目標を与えた。また、連邦準備制度理事会の議長に経済状況に関する証言を議会に提出しなければならないよう命じた。しかし、ジミー・カーター大統領の机にたどり着く頃には、「法律は明らかに象徴的だった」[25][26][27] ホーキンスは後に、職業訓練パートナーシップ法や1988年学校改善法などの画期的な法律を執筆しました。彼は1984年に下院教育労働委員会の委員長になった。

ホーキンスは、1980年代のロナルド・レーガンとジョージ・Hの大統領時代に達成した相対的な成功の欠如に不満を抱いていた。W。ブッシュ。彼らは1920年代以来最も保守的な大統領であり、彼自身の党のメンバーは右に移動し、ホーキンスの昔ながらのニューディーラーのスタンスを時代遅れと見なしていました。[5] 彼の最大の挫折はジョージ・Hだった。W。1990年のブッシュの公民権法の拒否権は、ホーキンス・ケネディ公民権法とも呼ばれます。マイノリティや女性の雇用慣行を雇用主から従業員に差別する証拠の負担をシフトした前年に行われた6つの最高裁判所の決定を覆しただろう。これは、米国史上公民権法の唯一の成功した拒否権のままです。ホーキンスは1991年に引退した。ブッシュは、ホーキンスの引退後、それほど広範ではない法案、1991年の公民権法に署名するだろう。5]

後世

ホーキンスは1991年にロサンゼルスの自宅に引退し、選出された役人として58年間選挙に負けたことはなかった。彼は残りの人生のためにワシントンD.C.に住んでいた。100歳で亡くなるまで、彼は議会で奉仕した最年長の人物でした。彼は100歳に達した議会で8人目の人物だった。ホーキンスの死は、元アラバマ共和党下院議員アーサー・グレン・アンドリュース(1909-2008)を最古の元下院議員として残した。

レガシー

オーガスタスF。ホーキンス自然公園は、2000年にロサンゼルス南部の高度に都市化された地域に建設されました。28][29] 費用は450万ドルで、主に市、郡、州の債券措置によって資金提供されました。[28] 公園は8.5エーカーを網羅し、自然史と環境解釈展示を含むエヴァンフランケルディスカバリーセンターを備えています。[30]

オーガスタスF.2012年に開校したロサンゼルスのホーキンス高校は、彼に敬意を表して名付けられました。

参照

参考文献

  1. ウィリアム・L。クレイ、ちょうど恒久的な利益:議会の黒人アメリカ人、1870-1991(ニューヨーク:アミスタッドプレス、Inc、1992):94。
  2. ^Claudia Luther and Valerie J.ネルソン(2007年11月13日)。ロサンゼルスの黒人議員のパイオニア。ロサンゼルスタイムズ。2021年9月17日取得none
  3. サイドズ、ジョシュ(2003)。L.A.都市の限界:大恐慌から現在までのアフリカ系アメリカ人ロサンゼルス。バークレーとロサンゼルス:カリフォルニア大学出版局。p.15。none
  4. シャーリー・ワシントン、議会の優れたアフリカ系アメリカ人(ワシントンDC:米国議会議事堂歴史協会、1998):39。
  5. ^事務員のオフィス「オーガスタス・フリーマン(ガス)・ホーキンス」。議会の黒人アメリカ人アメリカ合衆国下院。2010年8月4日にオリジナルからアーカイブされました。2010年8月11日取得none
  6. ワシントン、議会の優れたアフリカ系アメリカ人、39-40;「ホーキンス、オーガスタス」、現在の伝記、1983年:176-179。
  7. May, Lee (1989年9月28日)「不変のアイデンティティ:そしてアメリカでは、明るい肌の黒人は、人種が依然として多くの人々にとって重要であることを強く認識している」。ロサンゼルスタイムズ。2021年5月5日にオリジナルからアーカイブされました。2010年8月12日取得none
  8. ^Sides、Josh(2003)。L.A.都市の限界:大恐慌から現在までのアフリカ系アメリカ人ロサンゼルス。バークレーとロサンゼルス:カリフォルニア大学出版局。p.154です。none
  9. ^Sides、Josh(2003)。L.A.都市の限界:大恐慌から現在までのアフリカ系アメリカ人ロサンゼルス。バークレーとロサンゼルス:カリフォルニア大学出版局。p.33です。none
  10. サイドズ、ジョシュ(2003)。L.A.都市の限界:大恐慌から現在までのアフリカ系アメリカ人ロサンゼルス。バークレーとロサンゼルス:カリフォルニア大学出版局。p.107です。none
  11. 「まだ議会ポストを求めている、とホーキンスは言う」1958年11月14日、ロサンゼルスタイムズ:6
  12. グラッドウィン・ヒル、「家の中の8つの新しい席のためにカリフォルニアで戦っている16人の男性」、1962年10月20日、ニューヨークタイムズ:10
  13. 「黒人、議会に縛られ、州を離れることを嫌う」、1962年11月8日、ロサンゼルスタイムズ:16。
  14. ドリュー・ピアソン、「黒人下院議員ツアーズサウス」、1964年8月5日、ロサンゼルスタイムズ:A6。
  15. ピーター・バート、「非難で分断された役人」、1965年8月15日、ニューヨークタイムズ:81。
  16. オーガスタス・ホーキンス、オーラルヒストリーインタビュー:18。
  17. グロリア・エマーソン、「アメリカ人は南ベトナムの刑務所で残虐行為を見つける」、1970年7月7日、ニューヨークタイムズ:3;ジョージC.ウィルソン、「S.ベトナム刑務所は「衝撃的」を発見した」、1970年7月7日、ワシントンポスト:A1。
  18. フェリックス・ベルエア・ジュニア、「ハウスパネルは米国に「タイガーケージ」細胞を調査するよう促す」、1970年7月14日、ニューヨークタイムズ:1。
  19. 「オーガスタスF.Hawkins," Politics in America, 1989 (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc., 1988): 181.
  20. ジョン・ドレイファス、「待つことは報われる」、1973年4月19日、ロサンゼルスタイムズ:A3。
  21. オーガスタス・ホーキンス、オーラルヒストリーインタビュー:20;「ホーキンス、オーガスタス」、現在の伝記、1983年:177。
  22. ジャクリーン・トレスコット、「コーカス批評」、1980年9月27日、ワシントンポスト:D1。
  23. 議会記録、下院、第95コング、第2セッション。(1978年7月18日):21435。
  24. ワシントン、議会の優れたアフリカ系アメリカ人:42-43。
  25. ジャクリーン・トレスコット、「下院議員の長距離。ガス・ホーキンス;83歳で、公民権の着実なチャンピオンは終わらない戦いから引退している」、1990年10月24日、ワシントンポスト:D1
  26. エドワード・ウォルシュ、「ハンフリー・ホーキンス対策は大統領によって署名された」、1978年10月28日、ワシントンポスト:A9
  27. 「大統領は象徴的なハンフリー・ホーキンス法案に署名する」、1978年10月28日、ロサンゼルスタイムズ:17。
  28. ^bブラウン、パトリシア・リー(2000年12月28日)。公園はフープだけでなく自然を提供する(2000年出版)ニューヨークタイムズ.ISSN 0362-4331。2020年10月28日取得。none
  29. 「提案Oプロジェクト募集、ロサンゼルス市 - 提案O市民監督諮問委員会、p.2005年3月3日」(PDF)。2011年7月26日にオリジナル(PDF)からアーカイブされました。none
  30. 「ラマウンテン」。ラマウンテン。2013年5月10日にオリジナルからアーカイブされました。none

外部リンク

ウィキソースには、以下による、または約オリジナルの作品があります。
オーガスタスF.ホーキンス


Augustus Hawkins

Augustus Hawkins
Augustus Freeman Hawkins.jpg
Member of the
U.S. House of Representatives
from California
In office
January 3, 1963 – January 3, 1991
Preceded byEdgar W. Hiestand(redistricted)
Succeeded byMaxine Waters
Constituency21st district (1963–1975)
29th district (1975–1991)
Member of the California State Assembly
from the 62nd district
In office
January 7, 1935 – January 3, 1963
Preceded byFrederick Madison Roberts
Succeeded byTom Waite
Personal details
Born
Augustus Freeman Hawkins

August 31, 1907
Shreveport, Louisiana, U.S.
DiedNovember 10, 2007 (aged 100)
Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.
Political partyDemocratic
Spouse(s)Pegga Smith (1945–1966)
Elsie Hawkins (1977–2007)
EducationUniversity of California, Los Angeles (BA)

Augustus Freeman Hawkins (August 31, 1907 – November 10, 2007) was an American politician of the Democratic Party who served in the California State Assembly from 1935 to 1963 and the U.S. House Of Representatives from 1963 to 1991. Over the course of his career, Hawkins authored more than 300 state and federal laws, the most famous of which are Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act. He was known as the "silent warrior" for his commitment to education and ending unemployment.[1]

Contents

  • 1 Early and personal life
  • 2 Political career
    • 2.1 State Assembly
    • 2.2 U.S. Congress
  • 3 Later life
  • 4 Legacy
  • 5 See also
  • 6 References
  • 7 External links

Early and personal life

Hawkins was born in Shreveport, Louisiana, the youngest of five children, to Nyanza Hawkins and Hattie Freeman. In 1918, the family moved to Los Angeles.[2][3] Hawkins graduated from Jefferson High School in 1926, and received a bachelor's degree in economics from the University of California, Los Angeles in 1931.[4] After graduation, he planned to study civil engineering, but the financial constraints of the Great Depressionmade this impossible. This contributed towards his interest in politics, and his lifelong devotion to education. After graduating, Hawkins operated a real estate company with his brother and studied government.[5] While serving in the California State Assembly, Hawkins married Pegga Adeline Smith on August 28, 1945. Smith died in 1966, and Hawkins later married Elsie Taylor in 1977.[6] After retiring from Congress, he stayed in the Washington area because his wife preferred it, living there until his death, two months after hers.[2]

An African American of mixed-race ancestry, Hawkins was very fair-skinned and reportedly resembled his English grandfather.[5] Throughout his life, he was often assumed to be of solely white ancestry, though he refused to pass as white.[7][2]

Political career

Hawkins with President John F. Kennedy in 1962

State Assembly

Augustus Hawkins served in California at a time when black representation was so limited that "the black strategy for gaining political power was to exercise influence within the Democratic Party through voting for, and lobbying, white politicians."[8] Aside from Hawkins, "Los Angeles blacks had no other political representative in city, county, state, or federal government."[8]

Hawkins was part of a more general shift by African Americans away from the Republican and towards the Democratic Party.[9] Unlike the majority of African Americans, he supported Franklin D. Roosevelt's campaign for president in 1932. Hawkins favored measures such as the New Deal, which was wildly popular in the United States at large and the African American community in particular. Roosevelt would go on to be the first Democratic president to win the black vote, in 1936. In 1934, Hawkins supported the more controversial 1934 California gubernatorial election of Upton Sinclair, a socialist. Although Sinclair lost, Hawkins defeated Republican Frederick Madison Roberts, the great-grandson of Sally Hemings and President Thomas Jefferson and the first African American in the California State Assembly. Hawkins would serve as a Democratic member of the Assembly from 1935 until 1963, by the time of his departure being the most senior member, like Roberts before him.

Hawkins' district was primarily Latino American and African American. During his time in the Assembly, he introduced legislation including "a fair housing act, a fair employment practices act, low-cost housing and disability insurance legislation, and workers’ compensation provisions for domestic workers."[2][5] Along with education, fair practices in employment and housing became Hawkins' major causes. He received little support at the time for these measures from the Democratic Party, however.[9]Nevertheless, he was able to get some measures passed, including his fair housing law, which prohibited discrimination by any builders who received federal funds.[10] Hawkins was also a delegate to the National Conventions of 19401944 and 1960 as well as an electoral college presidential elector from California in 1944. In 1958, Hawkins sought to be Speaker of the California State Assembly, which was the second most powerful position in the state, after the Governor of California. Hawkins lost to Ralph M. Brown, but was made chairman of the powerful rules committee.[11][2] Had Hawkins succeeded, he would have been the first African American Speaker in Californian history. Willie Brown would achieve this feat in 1980. In 1962, Hawkins won a newly created majority-black congressional district encompassing central Los Angeles[12] With an endorsement from John F. Kennedy, Hawkins easily won the primary and the general election. After the election, Hawkins remarked, “It's like shifting gears—from the oldest man in the Assembly in years of service to a freshman in Congress.”[13]

U.S. Congress

From 1963 to 1991, Hawkins represented California's 21st District (1963–1975), and the 29th District (1975–1991), covering southern Los Angeles County, in Congress. Hawkins was consistently elected with over 80% of the vote in his Democratic-friendly district. He was the first black representative elected west of the Mississippi River.[5]

Hawkins was a strong supporter of President Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society. Early in his congressional career, he authored legislation including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that established the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Hawkins was a strong supporter of civil rights, and toured the South in 1964 to advocate for African-American voter registration.[14]

Five days after the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was signed into law, the Watts Riots occurred in Hawkins' district. It was the first of many race riotsin the 1960s. Hawkins urged his colleagues in Congress to increase antipoverty funds, but did not condone the violence.[15] Due to his light skin and heightened racial tensions, Hawkins had to be careful when he visited his district shortly after the riots.[7] The riots stalled the Great Society, particularly over the fair housing; blacks who benefited from Great Society laws were blamed as being harmful to the "law and order" of America, particularly if they were allowed to live next to whites. Fair housing was still an unpopular issue in America: Democratic Senate nominee Pierre Salinger lost to Republican George Murphy in California over the issue, marking the only Republican pickup amid Lyndon Johnson's crushing presidential victory over anti-civil rights Barry Goldwater in 1964. Open housing reform seemed next on the Great Society list after the Voting Rights Act was signed, but the Watts Riot put it on hold. It was not passed until after the 1968 assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.

On the Vietnam War, Hawkins initially agreed with President Johnson. In 1964, both insisted that the war undermined the Great Society and that the United States could not "impose our way of life on other people."[16]When it became clear that South Vietnam was not stable enough to survive without American backing, Hawkins increased his criticism of the war. After touring South Vietnam June 1970, Hawkins and fellow Democratic Representative William Anderson drafted a House Resolution urging Congress to "condemn the cruel and inhumane treatment" of prisoners in South Vietnam.[5] Anderson and Hawkins had visited South Vietnam with nine other congressmen, but they were the only two to visit a civilian South Vietnamese prison on Con Son Island, which they described as being akin to “tiger cages.”[17] The two Representatives also pressured President Nixon to send an independent task force to investigate the prison and “prevent further degradation and death.”[18]

Portrait of Hawkins in the Collection of the U.S. House of Representatives

Hawkins was a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus, and served as vice chairman during its first term (1971–1973).[5][2] Hawkins did not play a significant role in the CBC, as he preferred to focus on legislation rather than use Congress as a bully pulpit like other African Americans such as Adam Clayton Powell, Jr.Bill Clay, and Ron Dellums; Hawkins argued that there needed to be “clearer thinking and fewer exhibitionists in the civil rights movement.”[19] During this time, Hawkins succeeded in restoring honorable discharges to the 170 black soldiers of the 25th Infantry Regiment who had been falsely accused of a public disturbance in Brownsville, Texas, in 1906, and removed from the Army.[20] Unlike other CBC members, he sought cooperation from organized labor and white ethnics in order to make his agenda more likely to pass into law.[21] In 1980, Hawkins criticized the CBC as "85 percent social and 15 percent business."[22]

Aside from Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, laws that Hawkins was instrumental in passing include: the 1974 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, a law which provides certain protections to young criminal offenders; the 1978 Comprehensive Employment and Training Act; and the 1978 Pregnancy Disability Act, which aimed to prevent discrimination against women on the basis of pregnancy and of which Hawkins said, “we have the opportunity to ensure that genuine equality in the American labor force is more than an illusion and that pregnancy will no longer be the basis of unfavorable treatment of working women."[23][24] Hawkins is known best of all for the 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act, which Hawkins sponsored in 1977 alongside the legendary Senator Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota. The Bill gave the U.S. government the goal to provide full employment; it also ordered that the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board must provide Congress with testimony on the state of the economy. However, by the time it made to President Jimmy Carter's desk, "the legislation was clearly symbolic."[25][26][27] Hawkins later authored landmark legislation such as the Job Training Partnership Act and the 1988 School Improvement Act. He became chair of the House Education and Labor Committee in 1984.

Hawkins was frustrated from the relative lack of success that he achieved during the 1980s presidencies of Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. They were the most conservative presidents since the 1920s, and members of his own party were moving to the right and viewed Hawkins's old-school New Dealer stance as outdated.[5] His greatest setback was George H. W. Bush's veto of the Civil Rights Act of 1990, sometimes called the Hawkins-Kennedy Civil Rights Act. It would have reversed six Supreme Court decisions made in the previous year that had shifted the burden of proof of discriminating hiring practices of minorities or women from the employer to the employee. It remains the only successful veto of a civil rights act in United States history. Hawkins retired in 1991. Bush would sign a less expansive bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, after Hawkins's retirement.[5]

Later life

Hawkins retired in 1991 to his Los Angeles home, having never lost an election in 58 years as an elected official. He lived in Washington, D.C., for the remainder of his life. Until his death at the age of 100, he was the oldest living person to have served in Congress. He was the eighth person to have served in Congress that reached the age of 100. Hawkins's death left the former Alabama Republican Representative Arthur Glenn Andrews(1909–2008) as the oldest living former House member.

Legacy

The Augustus F. Hawkins Natural Park was built in 2000 in a highly urbanized area of south Los Angeles.[28][29] The cost was $4.5 million and was financed largely by city, county, and state bond measures.[28] The park encompasses 8.5 acres and features the Evan Frankel Discovery Center, which includes natural history and environmental interpretive displays.[30]

Augustus F. Hawkins High School in Los Angeles, opened in 2012, it is named in his honor.

See also

References

  1.  William L. Clay, Just Permanent Interests: Black Americans in Congress, 1870–1991 (New York: Amistad Press, Inc, 1992): 94.
  2. a b c d e f Claudia Luther and Valerie J. Nelson (November 13, 2007). "A pioneer for black lawmakers in L.A." Los Angeles Times. Retrieved September 17, 2021.none
  3.  Sides, Josh (2003). L.A. City Limits: African American Los Angeles from the Great Depression to the Present. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. p. 15.none
  4.  Shirley Washington, Outstanding African Americans of Congress (Washington, DC: United States Capitol Historical Society, 1998): 39.
  5. a b c d e f g h Office of the Clerk"Augustus Freeman (Gus) Hawkins"Black Americans in CongressUnited States House of Representatives. Archived from the original on August 4, 2010. Retrieved August 11, 2010.none
  6.  Washington, Outstanding African Americans of Congress, 39–40; “Hawkins, Augustus,” Current Biography, 1983: 176–179.
  7. a b May, Lee (September 28, 1989). "Mistaken Identities: And in America, Light-Skinned Blacks Are Acutely Aware That Race Still Matters to Many People"Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on May 5, 2021. Retrieved August 12, 2010.none
  8. a b Sides, Josh (2003). L.A. City Limits: African American Los Angeles from the Great Depression to the Present. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. p. 154.none
  9. a b Sides, Josh (2003). L.A. City Limits: African American Los Angeles from the Great Depression to the Present. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. p. 33.none
  10.  Sides, Josh (2003). L.A. City Limits: African American Los Angeles from the Great Depression to the Present. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. p. 107.none
  11.  “Still Seeks Assembly Post, Hawkins Says,” November 14, 1958, Los Angeles Times: 6
  12.  Gladwin Hill, “16 Men Battling in California for Eight New Seats in House,” October 20, 1962, New York Times: 10
  13.  “Negro, Congress-Bound, Loath to Leave State,” November 8, 1962, Los Angeles Times: 16.
  14.  Drew Pearson, “Negro Congressman Tours South,” August 5, 1964, Los Angeles Times: A6.
  15.  Peter Bart, “Officials Divided in Placing Blame,” August 15, 1965, New York Times: 81.
  16.  Augustus Hawkins, Oral History Interview: 18.
  17.  Gloria Emerson, “Americans Find Brutality in South Vietnamese Jail,” July 7, 1970, New York Times: 3; George C. Wilson, “S. Viet Prison Found 'Shocking',” July 7, 1970, Washington Post: A1.
  18.  Felix Belair, Jr., “House Panel Urges U.S. to Investigate 'Tiger Cage' Cells,” July 14, 1970, New York Times: 1.
  19.  “Augustus F. Hawkins,” Politics in America, 1989 (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc., 1988): 181.
  20.  John Dreyfuss, “Waiting Pays Off,” April 19, 1973, Los Angeles Times: A3.
  21.  Augustus Hawkins, Oral History Interview: 20; “Hawkins, Augustus,” Current Biography, 1983: 177.
  22.  Jacqueline Trescott, “Caucus Critiques,” September 27, 1980, Washington Post: D1.
  23.  Congressional Record, House, 95th Cong., second sess. (18 July 1978): 21435.
  24.  Washington, Outstanding African Americans of Congress: 42–43.
  25.  Jacqueline Trescott, “The Long Haul of Rep. Gus Hawkins; At 83, the Steady Champion of Civil Rights Is Retiring From a Battle That Won't End,” October 24, 1990, Washington Post: D1
  26.  Edward Walsh, “Humphrey–Hawkins Measure Is Signed by the President,” October 28, 1978, Washington Post: A9
  27.  “President Signs Symbolic Humphrey–Hawkins Bill,” October 28, 1978, Los Angeles Times: 17.
  28. a b Brown, Patricia Leigh (December 28, 2000). "A Park Offers Nature, Not Just Hoops (Published 2000)"The New York TimesISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 28, 2020.none
  29.  "Proposition O Call for Projects, City of Los Angeles – Proposition O Citizens Oversight Advisory Committee, p. 3, 2005" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 26, 2011.none
  30.  "Lamountains"Lamountains. Archived from the original on May 10, 2013.none

External links

Wikisource has original works by or about:
Augustus F. Hawkins
California Assembly
Preceded byMember of the California Assembly
from the 62nd district 

1935–1963
Succeeded by

Tom Waite

U.S. House of Representatives
Preceded byMember of the U.S. House of Representatives
from California's 21st congressional district 

1963–1975
Succeeded by
Preceded byMember of the U.S. House of Representatives
from California's 29th congressional district 

1975–1991
Succeeded by
Preceded byChair of House Administration Committee 
1981–1984
Succeeded by
Preceded byChair of House Education Committee 
1984–1991
Succeeded by
Honorary titles
Preceded byOldest living United States representative
(Sitting or former) 

2003–2007
Succeeded by
the community was just beginning to change in 1934 the community in south central the demographics were largely about 15 to 20 percent black and the rest of it was white very very few hispanics and virtually no asians it was a rather subtle community in that the population was stable the exodus to the city was not really at its zenith at that time in 1934 thereabout the south central community was pretty well isolated it was beginning to change the change was primarily from a white neighborhood to a black and uh it was a sprinkling then of white as they remain but most of the whites were moving out to the suburbia and the blacks who were coming in were primarily southerners and rather of the lower income group the higher income groups were moving to the west side of los angeles it was quite a a community in transition the promise of a better life i think sometimes those who are attracted to los angeles felt that it was a land of milk and honey and obviously they were also running away from things in the deep south that is lynchings and bad economic conditions segregation in various schools and things of that nature and they thought that the west promised them a new life altogether the south central area was not a a multicultural type of population it was primarily those who had older white residents who had uh stayed there for a long time and were only dislodged by new southern blacks uh as to the chinese or the asian population the asian population was concentrated elsewhere primarily in downtown los angeles so the very little mixture between the asians and the native whites and the new blacks who were moving into the area in great numbers well back in 34 uh as far as a hollywood connection i recall that uh i was at that time just graduating from college and i had been hired as a delivery boy in a way to deliver materials to the studios the studios were quite popular of course and my job was to deliver to the studios copies of acting bits so that the directors could choose a particular character for a particular scene and it was a very exciting thing for me beside being a job of course that i had an opportunity to go in and out of the studios the studios were quite uh discriminatory in a way very few blacks were in roles at that time there were one or two uh blacks including one outstanding one clarence muse who's a semi director and a actor who acted subparts but primarily as the best parts were in my opinion not of the ideal type the step and fetch it type of acting where some humor was provided or they needed some person to act as a servant to one of the stars of that time i was not too excited about the role of minorities in hollywood at the time and i thought that primarily the image that was conveyed of minorities in the movies reflected really a a a slavery type that is a plantation type and that that did not really give us in my opinion any uplift in the community or nationwide that blacks were beginning to get into the mainstream of american life was just the opposite was pretty obvious that as i was describing hollywood at that time it did not to me come across as portraying the type of roles that i thought should be portrayed it was ill attempt of the menstrual days of if a character happened to be of a prominent type it was a white person blackened to make to be made into a black in order to portray a role so that we did not have at that time the entrance of the lena horne type of a white complexion uh black person and uh the the carryover of prejudice and discrimination one must remember that california was not at that time a very progressive state there was great discrimination primarily against the chinese against the filipino and later against the japanese and across the main streets of los angeles one could as one walk down them see signs in the windows no colored persons allowed we do not cater to to blacks and that was quite quite prominent so that bigotry was very heavily displayed in hollywood it reflected the times when i had an opportunity to go on a lot of times we didn't let me indicate that as far as the theaters were concerned there was no discrimination in the theaters that is blacks were not confined to the so-called peanut gallery but the movies obviously were just beginning to change it was very exciting because we could see the first uh sound pictures the new technology was just beginning to come through al jolson type in the movies was quite an exciting experience and al jolson of course was again portrayed the type of a white person blackened up in order to provide entertainment and that was quite extensive uh the the movies were not uh from an artistic point of view the very best but they were a source of enjoyment and a new technology and along with the radio which was coming into prominence about that time it was exciting new experience for all of us uh i made a little uh radio sets on the side as in order to pick up a little extra money and we had a little crystal set little rock what we call a crystal set and earphones so we're talking about a very very crude technologically age the question of whether or not one identifies with a a film that seems foreign to that individual's culture is a rather exciting one i would say that the films of that particular period and i'm talking about the 30s uh were more or less looked at from an artistic point of view you you weren't really judging it critically philosophically but you went there for entertainment and that's about what you got uh as to whether or not it was actually portraying something it was so exciting as a new experience that i suspect that one would overlook the ideological aspects of it and while it did not portray let us say black america as black america was or as we had hoped that it would become was not really the the in important thing at that time uh later we became more critical of entertainment as such because we could see that it was shaping the image of people and influencing uh politically and socially american life but in the early days we were thrilled really to see something on the screen at the beginning one had very little uh thought of the tremendous influence that hollywood would have on america and on on the world for that matter uh it was seen from a technological point of view uh and uh the acting was the charles chaplin type that is you looked at it as a person who's a good actor good actress and so on uh it was later that we discovered that not only was acting entertainment but that it was also politically motivated that it was a means of shaping things uh shaping our lives creating lasting influences on people and then it became rather controversial and i guess this led to the later inquisition in which liberal writers and liberal actors were somehow ostracized by hollywood because they were beginning to change american life but at the earlier period of time and that was not so the motion picture industry from the viewpoint of employment of minorities was not a great source i would say there will be many more blacks employed as as caterers on location or let us say in more or less the lesser occupations custodians preparing actors for different scenes of that nature but and as chauffeurs and so on so that was only indirect employment that it was not a major source of employment for minorities as a matter of fact for even in the case of dramas where uh mexican actors were supposed to be featured many times they were not mexican so it was not just black it was a cultural bias that extended across the spectrum the question has sometimes risen that why did i uh in a sense become a democrat in an area that was highly republican at that time and in the 1930s the area that i lived in and that i represented lately in congress and earlier in the legislative branch of state government uh was just beginning to change the the greatest influence i would say at that time on myself was that i had struggled to get through school to go to college only to find out that i had no better opportunity than than one who hadn't gone to school at all and to me the situation was that republicanism was obsolete for blacks blacks were still republican merely because it was a party that had presumably freed the blacks out of and and brought them out of slavery but they were being starved to death under the hoover policies of that day president hoover uh uh in a sense drove blacks out of the republican party into the democratic ranks but that was just beginning when i when i decided that i was a candidate for office my influence came through my mother who was a democrat and wondered why my dad who had lost all of his money in banks closing under the hoover administration and when we were thrown without employment and and as a family i had to depend on surplus foods and so forth she couldn't understand it and so she shamed my dad into becoming a democrat but in a sense she started me out as a democrat and uh when i ran for office i ran as a democrat during this time there were many erratics i would say in terms of departures from normal living in california in that period of time that is throughout the 30s we had various movements we had the so-called towns and movement to give everyone 200 a month and we had the ham and eggs proposition that every thursday everybody was going to get a certain sum of money nobody ever asked how these things would be financed but they were dreams that people dreamed because times were tough hugh long was doing the same thing in the state of louisiana and in california we had the rise of an arthur upton sinclair he was in effect a socialist and viewed as a socialist not as a democrat and was not really accepted in the democratic party but he was a great influence on politics of that day and obviously he became the democratic nominee because the rest of the democratic candidates were too conservative and too republican-like to make a difference so often sinclair really upset the politics of the state and brought on a great uh opposition of all of the forces throughout the state uh the established groups the religious groups uh the so-called establishment of uh the conservative business people and so on and frightened the people so much until fortunately or unfortunately depend depending on one's view he lost but by sweeping the state with a great movement of that type he did get elected a progressive set up in the state that is congressman legislative state legislators were primarily elected as a result of this movement during the so-called epic movement in california and the candidacy of up to sinclair i would conclude that the state was shocked and highly motivated in reaction to the type of thing that was done in politics at that time utter sinclair was a very believable type of individual but he was not a convincing politician as such and i think that people were not quite ready for the type of statements that were being made and so it was fairly easy uh to scapegoat things by uh portraying uh upton sinclair as a communist or even beyond being a socialist uh and uh people were not quite ready for change the minorities who had recently made some gains were obviously conservative in trying to to protect those those gains the the the role of the minister in certain communities was a great influence and by and large the organized church's organized religion was heavily against ups and sinclair so that was a real force throughout the state but the type of things that were circulated is hardly believable there was a the whole idea of the state was that if upton sinclair was elected that california would almost sink into the ocean and i think the propaganda was such that eventually it was just too too much to overcome there are those who say also that some of the elections uh were manipulated in certain areas and i wouldn't doubt at all that uh ballot boxes were changed in conservative areas where they could get away with it there was a determination that upton sinclair was not going to be allowed to win and he didn't but the fortunate part of it was that a lot of good people uh rather liberal forward-looking people were elected at that time recall that that culvert olson became governor later because he was elected a state senator in the sinclair landslide and he built on that and became governor of the state and proved to be a good governor in the period of the mid 30s when minorities were beginning to get a toehold on the state in terms of political office in terms of breaking down discrimination in the unions when they were beginning to become [Music] judges for the first time and to be integrated into the postal service that they were in a sense becoming middle class and as such we had a movement that uh blacks are becoming more conservative politically and not the type but they they were getting a piece of the action and they wanted to protect it and i suspect that many uh just becoming a part of the middle class also did not enter into the epic movement as such professionals tended not to be supporters of the epic movement i recall that my own brother was a practicing physician and to him erton sinclair favored socialized medicine and i recall that i uh went into one of the sinclair headquarters invited to give my own views because i was a candidate i indicated that i favored a prepaid health insurance but not the socialization of medicine and i recall as a result of that i was not supported not endorsed by the epic movement and the primaries after i won my primary in the final analysis i was a part of the democratic ticket but not in the primary and i think that illustrates the conservative trend that was developing at that time for all of those who became democratic nominees were a part of the so-called epic ticket in the general election and that is the way it came about i was not opposed to the sinclair movement i just did not take a real position on it and as i say because of one or two issues that i had expressed myself on i was not endorsed by upton sinclair in my primary election as to whether or not uh um blacks as such responded to the up to upton sinclair movement i would say that it was very very lukewarm they were just becoming democrats and i think that change was fast enough for them for most of them and they weren't about to change from the republican party to the democratic party and then overnight they become allied with what was termed a socialist movement it was just too shockingly quick i think that in the final analysis they voted for the sinclair ticket in the general election but that's because they were then becoming strong democrats and their economic conditions made them more allied with the new party even though sinclair was a part of it than with the older party and consequently i would say that the support of sinclair in the black community was lukewarm uh the ministers who exercised quite an influence were not pro sinclair whether you can phrase it as being anti-sinclair i would not go that far i would say that they were supporters of the democratic ticket and more amount of splitting that ticket than it was a matter of being strongly anti-sinclair the black community has never been really scared by socialism and i'm not trying to identify necessarily their voting for against the epic movement on the basis of the fear of socialism well let me state in terms of that particular time and the politics of that particular time it was not a separate movement and such but we had several movements that coincided uh blacks as such were not attracted to the epic movement as such they were never a strong part of it the leaders were not let us say involved in the movement the movement had very very few minority leaders as such as a part of the epic movement but blacks were changing they were becoming democrats and the election was not only a an election that featured upton sinclair but it featured a lot of other candidates including myself for for example as a democrat and i was running as a as a democrat who happened obviously to be on a ticket with mr sinclair in the runoff during the epic movement in california let me make it clear that i was not actually running as an epic candidate i was never a strong epic and no particular reason i had no ideological uh objection to most of the program i was however a democrat a new new democrat who was running as a democratic candidate it was tough for me to convince many of my friends and supporters as a democrat that that was the right thing to do but i just happened to be a democrat and i ran as a democrat and while i disagreed with one or two things in the epic movement it doesn't say it doesn't mean that i was opposed to the whole idea of changing things across the state there were many things that needed changing and so it just happened we just happened to converge i think one was put into proper perspective that that was not the only thing that was happening particularly in the minority community minorities was just beginning to break through many barriers in those days we had a terrific time to get a black judge uh elected the first one in the state uh the first supervisor in in the post office the first woman uh in black woman in the post office and so forth now all of these things were happening at the same time that the epic movement was happening and so it was not a monolithic a monolithic community it was a community that was undergoing a great transition and as such the uh uh people i think i think a majority did vote uh democratic and consequently uh for the epic ticket and so that the two coincided rather than one being the cause of the other during the the epic campaign i i think that most of us do recall uh the tremendous pressure that was put on everybody throughout the state to oppose uh upton sinclair at least the top of the ticket and i recall that in business after business throughout industry employers would call their employees in just before the election and would tell them now look if upton sinclair is elected you're not going to have a job i can recall that in many households blacks who were in household service and that was a great number of them we're told now look if mr sinclair is elected i won't be able to hire you to continue in employment and that type of pressure was throughout the state and that was a tremendous disincentive to vote for the top of the ticket for a long time african americans were not were not the ones who enjoyed the government benefits they had been denied this in the deep south and even in the north and and also in the west the idea of the government helping them was somewhat foreign in 1935 when the social security act was passed i think one must remember that the act included not only protection for the elderly but it also began uh protection for children for the first time child aid became a reality and that was an important part of the act for blacks and the act also provided help for the disabled and led also to such later programs in medicare medicaid and whatnot and these were tremendous benefits to the black community which had been denied them even when they were offered to others but for the first time everyone enjoyed the benefits of something under the social security act and i think that that to blacks it was a great lifesaver it's pretty difficult to visualize what uh type of security people didn't have in those days instead of social security the elderly were confined to uh what we call then the poor houses uh it was uh uh places set aside for the elderly where they were in a sense incarcerated in a poor house when they became elderly the mental and the mental cases were were actually locked up uh those who did not have families with the adoption of social security in 1935 to black americans is almost like the emancipation proclamation something comparable or something like the magna carta and the english tradition for the first time blacks considered themselves having something which others had and which was guaranteed to them which they could not be denied everything that that happened that was good uh was somehow denied to uh african americans uh but uh under the social security act uh there was no such distinction made and so it was a real breakthrough that to them it simply mean meant at that time that as they grew older they knew that they would gain this as a matter of right they knew that their children under child care which later became the uh afdc and medicaid and so forth they knew that this was an opportunity that they could pass on to the next generation so it was revolutionary and a great uh great day not only in american life but i think an outstanding day similar to the emancipation proclamation among african americans at first obviously there was this omission that was the omission of domestic workers but that that was soon repaired and on the state level we moved to do it we moved to get those benefits for domestics on the state level but at that time and later obviously domestic service was not as important to blacks as other occupations and we're getting sort of anticipating a later period when domestic service was no longer the major activity or the source of income for black americans in 1934 we in the state were highly involved in civil rights i would say that we had a civil rights movement prior to the year one in the 60s i have indicated that there were signs throughout the state that indicated that blacks were not welcome in places of public accommodation traveling was a problem at first it was directed against the chinese orientals who could not ride streetcars in some places throughout the state and at that time we moved to strengthen our civil rights act we had a civil rights act in california quite early but it was not very strong and it was very poorly enforced so we moved to strengthen that and i would say that in the period from about 30 2 to about 40 that the great impetus was in strengthening the civil rights act we were not as much concerned with other issues as we were with one great issue of civil rights it was my personal hope that as a member of the state legislature we could strengthen the act so that we could in effect allow minorities to ride undisturbed on streetcars to testify in the courts where white persons were concerned in order to break down segregation in the schools the schools were highly segregated and also we were just starting out to strengthen the law which would protect minorities against restrictive covenants they couldn't buy in certain neighborhoods because they were restricted i'm often asked what motivated me to run for a public office at that time to run for the state assembly one i think has to put it into proper perspective in the state of california we had one official one african american elected official and that official happened to come from our community the the individual was very conservative he died in the world republican who did not really do very much in terms of the needs of the people was not concerned about jobs and housing and civil rights and so forth but merely because he was black was supported rather with great pride by a community that felt that that was the only official we had he's ours and we've got to elect him and so a group of us young people having graduated from college and without jobs uh felt that uh that indicated to the to the state and to all forces throughout the state that we were not really uh meaningful we had no power we had a had a voice that didn't speak for us and so we decided that that individual had to be defeated in order to turn things around uh and we supported a candidate in 1932 in order to defeat that individual the candidate lost because the candidate had really been put in by the opposition and so we decided that among this little group of young people that we had to put one of our own up and i happened to be selected by that group and supported and for that reason uh i ran and happened to be elected in that election near the end of the decade of the 30s.


38:10
 there was a reaction to the new deal programs business interests that had really profited under the new deal decided that that it was too revolutionary that in some way various activities would be nationalized or that the so-called private enterprise would be somewhat diminished by national regulations and social programs.
a recession developed that and we began to see unemployment again that we had escaped a decade earlier and as a result of that the new deal was hard pressed to think of new programs mr roosevelt persisted.
 however and at first there was an attempt to balance the budget when that failed failed to produce the type of economic activity that was needed to put people to work.
 mr roosevelt just thought of new agencies and kept thinking of new agencies to put people to work to provide for those who were in hardship or distressed.
and so we began to see again some of the agencies that were earlier created such as an extension of the works progress administration the public works administration.
and so on and so instead of having people idle go on a dole um they we had new agencies that created jobs building bridges preparing buildings that needed preparing the concept being that they had put people to work doing that which would not compete with the private sector.


38:10
 ニューディールプログラムに対する反発がありました。ニューディールの下で本当に利益を得ていた企業関係者は、ニューディールは革命的すぎる、何らかの形で様々な活動が国有化されるのではないか、いわゆる私企業は国の規制や社会プログラムによっていくらか衰退するのではないか、と考えたのです。
 その結果、ニューディールは新しいプログラムを考える必要に迫られたのですが、ルーズベルトは粘り強く対応しました。

 しかし、最初は予算を均衡させる試みがありましたが、それが失敗し、人々を働かせるために必要な経済活動を生み出すことができませんでした。
 ルーズベルト氏は、人々を働かせるための新しい機関を考え、苦境にある人々を支援するための新しい機関を考え続けました。
その結果、公共事業庁の延長であるワークス・プログレス・アドミニストレーションなど、以前に作られたいくつかの機関が再び見られるようになりました。
そうして、失業者を出す代わりに、橋をかけたり、建物を建てたりする仕事を作り出す新しい機関ができました。)

40:10

all of the activity that i've indicated that was happening on the national scene was duplicated on a smaller scale within the state the state was beginning to develop some huge projects which did employ people we had to go over to the colorado river to get water so that we had to build a transmission line that employed a large number of individuals we had to go 300 miles to the high sierras to get a water supply for the city so the metropolitan water district became a most important thing for the development of southern california and so in terms of building flood control getting a water supply irrigating the farms of the various valleys individuals were employed and this was a type of work which gradually we got minorities into prior to that time many had been sent over the mountains what we call the mountains with the ridge route to san francisco in order to pick cotton in the valley that was a temporary type of of work harvesting the crops thought the the projects were primarily supported by taxpayers money the metropolitan water district consisted not only of los angeles but every small town in southern california needed a water supply so so the money came from bond issues and from the people taxing themselves in order to support them the uh the generation of power from the colorado river the old boulder dam project as was earlier called was federally supported but it was a a regional project localized primarily in california which needed the the power more than any of the other states in the southwest but indirectly it was such projects as this that kept the people employed as the as the work project idea uh became somewhat obsolete i didn't employ enough people we began anticipating the arming of the country for the uh what became world war ii and so uh along with uh uh with such international episodes is mussolini going into ethiopia the germans going into uh czechoslovakia and so forth there was a great amount of activity started in california because of its climate uh in in in preparing for a defense posture and that began to employ people and while it was accelerated much more later it started about 30 35 between 35 and 40 1940. in california we never really marked the close of the new deal i would say that we suffered less than the rest of the country uh california was a progressive state is much more progressive than even now and we were moving ahead in order to anticipate and increase prosperity we were beginning through our universities through california technology through a stanford university california system and such universities to develop outstanding products and actually we were on the ver we saw the verge of growing technology and in many places we were quite advanced now i'm not saying that that kept up but at that time with respect to the rest of the country we were doing extremely well agriculture was was highly productive we had mechanized reforms we had specialty crops and i would say it was to a long time of a leading industry the the of course the war effort was more highly developed in the 40s rather than in the decade of the 30s but our defense industries were developed and in shipbuilding aircraft and and allied industries we were ahead of the rest of the country.

コミュニティは 1934 年に変化し始めたばかりだった 南中部のコミュニティの人口統計は、大部分が約 15 ~ 20 パーセントの黒人で、残りは白人でした。 1934年の当時、都市への流出はそれほど盛んではありませんでしたが、南部中央のコミュニティはかなり孤立していて、変化し始めていました。変化は主に白人の近所から黒人への変化でした。彼らはまだ白人ですが、ほとんどの白人は郊外に移動しており、入ってきた黒人は主に南部人であり、低所得グループではなく高所得グループがロサンゼルスの西側に移動していました.それはかなりaaコミュニティでした.より良いものへの移行の約束ロサンゼルスに惹かれる人々は、そこがミルクとハチミツの土地だと感じていることもあると思います。明らかに彼らは、深南部でのリンチや経済状況の悪さ、さまざまな学校での隔離、そのような性質のものからも逃げていました。そして彼らは、西側が彼らに新しい生活を約束したと考えていた南中央地域は多文化的なタイプの人口ではなかった.中国人またはアジア人の人口に関しては、アジア人の人口は主にロサンゼルスのダウンタウンに集中していたため、アジア人と原住民の白人との間の混合物はほとんどなく、34 uh のように大量にこの地域に移動していました。ハリウッドまで当時、私は大学を卒業したばかりで、スタジオに素材を配達するために配達員として雇われていたことを思い出します.スタジオはもちろん非常に人気があり、私の仕事はスタジオにコピーを配達することでした.監督が特定のシーンで特定のキャラクターを選ぶことができるように少し演技をしたり、もちろん仕事であることに加えて、スタジオに出入りする機会があったことは私にとって非常にエキサイティングなことでした.スタジオはかなり差別的でした.当時、役職に就いている黒人はほとんどいなかったので、1 人か 2 人の黒人がいて、そのうちの 1 人は卓越したクラレンス ミューズでした。サブパートを演じたセミディレクターと俳優でしたが、主に私の意見では、最良の部分は理想的なタイプではなく、ユーモアが提供された、または誰かの使用人として行動する必要があるタイプの演技でした。当時のスター 私は当時、ハリウッドでのマイノリティの役割についてあまり興奮していませんでした.映画で伝えられたマイノリティのイメージは、プランテーションタイプである奴隷制タイプを反映していると思いました。私の意見では、黒人がアメリカの生活の主流になり始めたというコミュニティや全国的な盛り上がりを実際に私たちに与えることはありません.私が演じるべきだと思っていたタイプの役を演じたのは悪い試みだった月経期のキャラクターがたまたま目立つタイプだった場合、当時レナホーンの入り口がなかったように、役割を描写するために黒くするために黒くした白人でした白い顔色のタイプ ええと、黒人であり、ええと、偏見と差別の持ち越しである 覚えておかなければならないのは、カリフォルニアは当時、非常に進歩的な州ではなかった 主に中国人に対する大きな差別であり、フィリピン人に対するものであり、後には日本人に対するものであり、世界中で大きな差別があったロサンゼルスのメインストリートを歩いていると、有色人種立ち入り禁止の標識が窓に見える 黒人に対応していない それはかなり目立っていたので、ハリウッドでは偏見が非常に重く示されていました それは私がいた時代を反映しています私たちがしなかった多くの時間に行く機会」劇場に関する限り、黒人はいわゆるピーナッツギャラリーに限定されていないという差別はありませんでしたが、映画は明らかに変化し始めたばかりでした。最初の音の写真 新しい技術はちょうどアル・ジョルソンを通して登場し始めたばかりでした 映画の中でのタイプは非常にエキサイティングな経験でした そしてもちろんアル・ジョルソンは娯楽を提供するために黒く塗られた白人のタイプを再び描写しました そしてそれはかなり広範でしたええと、映画は芸術的な観点からは最高のものではありませんでしたが、映画は楽しみの源であり、新しいテクノロジーであり、その頃に注目を集めていたラジオとともに、私たち全員にとって刺激的な新しい経験でした。横に小さなラジオセットを作りました。少し余分なお金を集めるために、私たちはクリスタルセットとイヤホンと呼ばれる小さなクリスタルセットの小さなロックを持っていたので、私たちは技術的に非常に粗雑な時代について話している.その個人の文化にとって異質なものはかなり刺激的なものです その特定の時代の映画と私が話しているのは1930年代についてです ええと、多かれ少なかれ芸術的な観点から見られていました あなたはそれを批判的に判断していませんでした哲学的にですが、あなたは娯楽​​のためにそこに行きました。それが実際に何かを描いているかどうかについて、あなたが得たものについてです。新しい経験として非常にエキサイティングだったので、そのイデオロギー的側面を見落としているのではないかと思います。当時は重要なことではなかった、または私たちが望んでいたように、それは実際にはそうではなかった.しかし、初期の頃、私たちは最初にスクリーン上で何かを見ることに本当に興奮していました.ハリウッドがアメリカと世界に与えるであろう途方もない影響についてはほとんど考えていませんでした。視点ええとええと、演技はチャールズ・チャップリンでしたあなたがそれを人として見たタイプです良い俳優 良い女優 など ええと、演技はエンターテイメントであるだけでなく、それが物事を形作る手段であり、私たちの生活を形作り、人々に永続的な影響を与えるという政治的動機も持っていることを後で発見しました。物議を醸し、これが後の異端審問につながったと思います。ハリウッドでは、リベラルな作家やリベラルな俳優が、アメリカの生活を変え始めていたため、どういうわけか排斥されました。マイノリティの雇用は大きな情報源ではありませんでした. ロケでケータリングとして雇われている黒人がもっとたくさんいると思います.となることによってメキシコの俳優が何度も登場するはずだったドラマの場合でも、メキシコ人ではないので、黒人だけではありませんでした.スペクトル全体に広がった文化的偏見. 当時は非常に共和党だった地域で、ある意味で私が民主主義者になったのはなぜかという疑問が時々持ち上がった.議会と州政府の立法部門で、ええと、変化が始まったばかりでした.当時私が自分自身に与えた最大の影響は、大学に行くために学校を卒業するのに苦労したことでした。持っていた人よりも機会を私は学校に全く通っていませんでしたが、私にとっての状況は、共和主義は黒人にとって時代遅れであったということでした.黒人を奴隷制から解放し、奴隷制から解放したと思われる政党であるという理由だけで、黒人は依然として共和党員でしたが、彼らは餓死していました.当時のフーバー大統領のフーバー政策の下で、フーバー大統領はある意味で黒人を共和党から民主的な地位に追いやったが、それはちょうど始まったばかりだった。民主党員であり、フーバー政権の下で銀行が閉鎖され、私たちが仕事を失い、家族として私が余剰食品に頼らなければならなかったとき、なぜ私の父がすべてのお金を失ったのか疑問に思いました。私はそれを理解していないので、彼女は私の父を恥じて民主党員になりましたが、ある意味では、彼女は私を民主党員として始めました。カリフォルニアでの通常の生活から 1930 年代を通して、さまざまな動きがありました。いわゆるタウンと呼ばれる動きがあり、すべての人に月 200 を与える動きがあり、毎週木曜日に誰もが手に入れるハムと卵の提案がありました。一定額の資金がどのように調達されるのか誰も尋ねたことはありませんでしたが、時代が厳しかったため、人々が夢見ていた夢でした.ヒューはルイジアナ州とカリフォルニア州で同じことをしていました.事実上社会主義者であり、民主主義者としてではなく社会主義者とみなされ、そうではなかった彼は民主党で本当に受け入れられましたが、彼はその日の政治に大きな影響を与え、明らかに彼は民主党の候補者になりました。残りの民主党候補はあまりにも保守的で共和主義的すぎて違いを生み出すことができなかったので、シンクレアは政治を本当に混乱させることがよくありました州のすべての勢力の大きな反対をもたらし、確立されたグループ、宗教団体、いわゆる確立された保守的なビジネスマンなど、人々を非常に怖がらせるまで、幸か不幸かまで人に依存する」彼はその見解を失ったが、その種の大規模な運動で州を一掃することによって、彼は実際に選出された 州議会議員立法府である州で進歩的な組織を選出したカリフォルニア州とシンクレアまでの立候補は、州がショックを受け、当時の政治で行われたことのタイプに反応して非常にやる気があったと結論付けます.シンクレアは非常に信頼できるタイプの個人でしたが、説得力のある政治家ではありませんでした.そういうわけで、私は人々が行われているタイプの声明の準備ができていなかったと思うので、アプトン・シンクレアを共産主義者として、または社会主義者であることを超えて描写することによって、物事をスケープゴートにすることはかなり簡単でした。持っていたマイノリティを変える準備ができていない最近、いくつかの利益が得られましたが、それらの利益を守ろうとすることは明らかに保守的でした.特定のコミュニティでの牧師の役割は大きな影響力があり、概して、組織化された教会の組織化された宗教はアップとシンクレアに強く反対していたので、それは本当の力でした.アプトン・シンクレアが選出されたら、カリフォルニアはほとんど海に沈むだろうというのが州全体の考えであり、プロパガンダは、最終的にはただの克服するには多すぎる。一部の選挙が特定の分野で操作されたと言う人もいます。投票箱が保守的な地域で変更されたのではないかと疑っています.アプトン・シンクレアが勝つことは許されないという決定がありました.しかし幸運だったのは、多くの善良な人々、つまりリベラルで前向きな人々が当時選出されたことでした。暗渠のオルソンが後に州知事になったのは、シンクレアの地滑りで州上院議員に選出され、その上に築かれたからであることを思い出してください。そして州知事になり、30 年代半ばにマイノリティーが政治的役職の観点から州の足がかりを得始めたときに、組合での差別を打破し始めたときに優れた知事であることが証明されました。初めて[音楽]の裁判官になり、郵便サービスに統合されることで、彼らはある意味で中産階級になり、そのため、黒人はタイプではなく政治的に保守的になりつつあるという動きがありましたが、彼らは得ていましたアクションの一部であり、彼らはそれを保護したいと考えていました。中産階級の一部になったばかりの多くの人々も、叙事詩運動の支持者ではない傾向があったため、叙事詩運動には参加しなかったと思われます.そして、シンクレア本社の 1 つに行って、私が候補者だったので、私自身の意見を述べるように言われたことを思い出します。私は前払いの健康保険に賛成したが、医療の社会化には賛成しなかったことを示しました。最終的な分析で予備選挙に勝った後、壮大な運動や予備選挙によって支持されていない私は民主的なチケットの一部でしたが、予備選挙ではありませんでした。民主的な候補者になった人はの一部でした総選挙でのいわゆる壮大なチケット、そしてそれが起こった方法です 私はシンクレア運動に反対していませんでした 私はそれについて本当の立場をとっていませんでした そして私が言ったように、私が表明した1つまたは2つの問題のために私自身は、私の予備選挙でアプトン・シンクレアによって支持されていませんでした.ええと、黒人がアップトン・シンクレア運動に反応したかどうかについてです.共和党から民主党に変わるつもりはなかったのに、一夜にして彼らは社会主義運動と呼ばれるものと同盟を結ぶことになったのです。彼らは総選挙でシンクレアのチケットに投票したが、それは'なぜなら、彼らは当時強力な民主党員になりつつあり、経済状況により、シンクレアが古い党よりも新党に属していたとしても、彼らは新党とより同盟を結んだためです。その結果、黒人コミュニティにおけるシンクレアの支持は生ぬるいものでした。かなりの影響力を行使した閣僚は、あなたがそれを反シンクレアであると表現できるかどうかにかかわらず、プロシンクレアではありませんでした.私はそこまで行きません.黒人コミュニティが社会主義に恐怖を感じたことは一度もありません。社会主義への恐怖に基づいて壮大な運動に反対する彼らの投票を必ずしも特定しようとしているわけではありません。その特定の時代とその特定の時代の政治に関して述べさせてください。それは別の運動などではありませんでした。同時に起こった運動 ええと 黒人などは壮大な運動に惹かれなかったので、彼らは決してその強力な部分ではありませんでした 指導者は運動に関与したとは言えませんでした壮大な運動でしたが、黒人は変化しつつあり、彼らは民主党になりつつあり、選挙はアプトン・シンクレアをフィーチャーした選挙であっただけでなく、例えば民主党員としての私を含む他の多くの候補者をフィーチャーし、私は民主党員として立候補していました。明らかにミスター・シンクレアのチケットにカリフォルニアでの壮大な運動中の流出により、私が実際に叙事詩の候補者として立候補したのではないことを明確にさせてください.民主党候補として立候補していた新しい民主党員にとって、友人や支持者の多くに、それが正しいことだと説得するのは大変でしたが、私はたまたま民主党員であり、民主党員として出馬しました。叙事詩運動の一つか二つのことに同意しないとは言っていない」つまり、私は州全体で物事を変えるという考え全体に反対していたということです。変化が必要なことがたくさんあり、たまたま収束したのです。それが唯一のことではないという適切な視点が与えられたと思います。特にマイノリティ コミュニティで起こっている マイノリティは多くの障壁を突破し始めたばかりでした 当時、私たちは黒人の裁判官を獲得するのに素晴らしい時間を過ごしました 州で最初の裁判官を選出しました 郵便局の最初の監督者 ええと 最初の女性郵便局の黒人女性など、これらすべてのことは壮大な運動が起こっているのと同時に起こっていたので、一枚岩のコミュニティではなく、大きな変化を遂げていたコミュニティでした。ええと、人々、私は過半数が投票したと思います。民主的であり、その結果、エピックチケットのために、そしてエピックキャンペーン中に一方が他方の原因になるのではなく、2つが一致するようになりましたii私たちのほとんどは、州中のすべての人に反対するようにかけられた途方もない圧力を覚えていると思いますアプトン・シンクレアは少なくともチケットの一番上にあり、業界全体のビジネスの中で、雇用主は選挙の直前に従業員に電話をかけ、アプトン・シンクレアが選出された場合、あなたは仕事を失うだろうと彼らに言いました。多くの家庭で黒人が家事奉仕をしていたことを思い出すことができます.シンクレア氏が選出された場合、私は勝てないと言われています.雇用を継続するためにあなたを雇うことができず、そのような圧力は州全体にあり、それは長い間、チケットのトップに投票するための途方もない意欲をそそるものでした.アフリカ系アメリカ人は政府の利益を享受していなかった.彼らはこれを南の奥深くで、さらには北でも西でも否定されていた.1935年に社会保障法が可決されたとき、政府が彼らを支援するという考えはやや異質だった.高齢者の保護だけでなく、子供の保護も始まった初めての児童扶養手当が現実のものとなり、それは黒人のための法律の重要な部分であり、この法律は障害者への支援も提供し、その後のメディケアのプログラムにもつながりましたメディケイドなど、これらは非常に大きなメリットでした他の人に提供されたときでさえ否定されていた黒人コミュニティですが、社会保障法の下で初めて誰もが何かの恩恵を享受しました.黒人にとってそれは大きな命の恩人だったと思います。セキュリティ担当者の当時、高齢者は社会保障の代わりに、私たちが貧しい家と呼んでいるものに閉じ込められていました。そして、精神的なケースは実際に閉じ込められていました ええと、1935年に黒人アメリカ人に社会保障が採用された家族を持たなかった人々は、解放宣言に匹敵するもの、またはマグナカルタと初めての黒人の英国の伝統のようなものです。他の人が持っていて、彼らに保証されている何かを自分自身が持っていると考えていた.それは起こったことすべてを否定することはできなかった.それは、アフリカ系アメリカ人にどういうわけか否定された.だからそれはだった彼らにとって本当のブレークスルーとは、単に、彼らが年をとるにつれて、権利の問題としてこれを得ることができることを知っていたことを単に意味していたということです。これは彼らが次の世代に引き継ぐことができる機会だったので、革命的で素晴らしい日であり、アメリカの生活だけでなく、アフリカ系アメリカ人の間での解放宣言に似た素晴らしい日だったと思います。それは家事労働者の省略でしたが、それはすぐに修復され、州レベルでそれを行うために移動しましたが、州レベルで家事労働者にそれらの利益を得るために移動しましたが、当時とその後明らかに家事サービスは黒人にとってそれほど重要ではありませんでした他の職業と私たちのように1934年に家事奉仕が黒人の主要な活動や収入源ではなくなった後の時期を予想しているように感じます.州の私たちは公民権に深く関わっていました. 1960 年代の 1 年目、私は、公共の宿泊施設の場所で黒人を歓迎しないことを示す標識が州全体にあったことを指摘しました。旅行は当初、路面電車に乗れない中国の東洋人に向けられたものでした。当時、私たちは公民権法を強化するために動きました.カリフォルニア州ではかなり早い時期に公民権法を制定しましたが、それはあまり強力ではなく、施行も不十分だったので、私たちはそれを強化するために動きました.約 30 2 ~ 約 40 の大きな推進力公民権法を強化することでした.私たちは公民権の1つの大きな問題ほど他の問題には関心がありませんでした.州議会の一員として法を強化し、実際にマイノリティが邪魔されずに路面電車に乗ることを許可する 学校での隔離を打破するために、白人が関与している法廷で証言する 学校は高度に隔離されており、制限的な誓約からマイノリティを保護する法律を強化し始めたばかりでした制限されているため、特定の地域では購入できませんでした当時州議会に立候補するために公職に立候補した理由をよく尋ねられましたが、カリフォルニア州で適切な視点でそれを考えなければならないと思います.私たちのコミュニティの出身者 非常に保守的だった 世界で亡くなった 共和主義者であり、人々のニーズに関してあまり何もしなかった 仕事や住居、公民権などには関心がなく、単に彼が黒人だったという理由だけでそれが私たちが持っている唯一の公式であると感じたコミュニティによって、むしろ大きな誇りを持ってサポートされました。彼は私たちのものであり、私たちのものです。彼を選出しなければならないので、大学を卒業して仕事を持たない私たち若者のグループは、州と州全体のすべての勢力に、私たちが本当に意味のあるものではないことを示していると感じました。ない声を持っていた私たちに代弁して、事態を好転させるためにその個人を打ち負かさなければならないと私たちは決定し、1932年にその候補者を打ち負かすために候補者を支援しました。そこで私たちは、この小さな若者グループの中から自分たちのグループを立ち上げなければならないと決め、私はたまたまそのグループに選ばれ、支持されました。 1930 年代の 10 年間、ニューディール プログラムへの反応があり、ニューディールの下で実際に利益を得ていたビジネス上の利益は、何らかの形でさまざまな活動が国有化されること、またはいわゆる民間企業が何らかの方法で国有化されることは革命的すぎると判断しました。国の規制や社会プログラムによって幾分減少する不況がそれを発展させ、10年前に逃れた失業が再び見られるようになり、その結果、新しい契約は新しいプログラムを考えるのに苦労しましたが、ルーズベルト氏は固執し、最初は予算のバランスをとる試みがありました.人々を働かせるために必要なタイプの経済活動を生み出せなかったルーズベルト氏は、新しい機関について考え、人々を働かせて苦難や苦境にある人々を養うための新しい機関を考え続けたので、私たちは始めました。工事進捗管理局や公共事業管理局などの拡張機能など、以前に作成された機関のいくつかをもう一度見てみましょう。人々を怠け者にする代わりに、橋を架ける準備をする仕事を生み出す新しい機関がありました。準備が必要な建物コンセプトは、民間部門と競合しないすべての活動を行うために人々を働かせたということです。ve は、全国的なシーンで起こっていたことが、州内で小規模に複製されたことを示しました。州は、コロラド川に水を得るために人を雇わなければならなかったいくつかの巨大なプロジェクトを開発し始めていました。多数の個人を雇用した送電線 市に水を供給するために 300 マイルのシエラ山脈まで行かなければならなかったため、大都市の水域は南カリフォルニアの開発にとって最も重要なものになり、建物の洪水の観点からもそうでした。さまざまな渓谷の農場を灌漑するための水の供給を管理するために個人が雇用されました。これは、山への尾根ルートを持つ山と呼ばれる山を越えて送られていました。綿を摘みにフランシスコ谷では、作物を収穫する一時的な仕事でした.プロジェクトは主に納税者のお金によって支えられていると考えていました.大都市の水道地区はロサンゼルスだけでなく、南カリフォルニアのすべての小さな町で構成されていました債券の問題から、そしてそれらをサポートするために自分自身に課税する人々から、ええと、コロラド川からの電力の生成は、以前に呼ばれた古いボールダーダムプロジェクトは連邦政府によって支援されましたが、主にカリフォルニアに局地化された地域プロジェクトであり、南西部の他のどの州よりも大きな力を持っていますが、間接的には、このようなプロジェクトが人々を雇用し続けたので、仕事のプロジェクトのアイデアは時代遅れになりました.十分な人員を雇用し、第二次世界大戦に備えて国の武装化を期待し始めたので、そのような国際的なエピソードと一緒に、ムッソリーニがエチオピアに行き、ドイツ人がチェコスロバキアに行き、などなど、大量のものがありました活動の開始はカリフォルニアの気候のため、防御態勢の準備にあり、それは人々を雇用し始めました。それははるかに後に加速されましたが、1940 年の 35 から 40 の間に約 30 35 が始まりました。カリフォルニアでは、私たちは新しい契約の締結を実際にマークしたことはありませんでした.国の他の地域よりも私たちが苦しんだことはありません.カリフォルニアは進歩的な州であり、現在よりもはるかに進歩的であり、繁栄を予測して増加させるために前進していました.私たちはスタンフォード大学のカリフォルニアのシステムを通じてカリフォルニアの技術を通じて大学を通じて始めていました。そのような大学は優れた製品を開発しました。実際、私たちは技術の成長の危機に瀕していました。それが維持されているとは言いませんが、当時、私たちは国の他の地域と比べて非常にうまくいっていました。農業は非常に生産的でした。機械化された改革があり、特殊な作物がありました。もちろん、戦争への取り組みは 1930 年代よりも 40 年代の方が高度に発達しましたが、防衛産業は発展し、造船機や関連産業では他の国よりも先を行っていました。

0:01

the community was just beginning to change in 1934 the community in south central

0:09

the demographics were largely about

0:16

15 to 20 percent black and the rest of it was white

0:23

very very few hispanics and virtually no

0:29

asians it was a rather subtle community

0:35

in that the population was stable the exodus to the city was not

0:42

really at its zenith at that time in 1934 thereabout

0:49

the south central community was pretty well isolated it was beginning to

0:55

change the change was primarily from a white neighborhood

1:02

to a black and uh it was a sprinkling then of white

1:09

as they remain but most of the whites were moving out to the suburbia

1:15

and the blacks who were coming in were primarily

1:21

southerners and

1:26

rather of the lower income group the higher income groups were moving to the

1:33

west side of los angeles it was quite a a community in transition

1:41

the promise of a better life i think sometimes

1:47

those who are attracted to los angeles felt that it was a land of milk and

1:52

honey and obviously they were also running away from things in the deep

1:59

south that is lynchings and bad economic conditions

2:05

segregation in various schools and things of that nature and they

2:11

thought that the west promised them a new life altogether

2:19

the south central area was not a a multicultural

2:24

type of population it was primarily

2:30

those who had older white residents who had uh

2:36

stayed there for a long time and were only dislodged by

2:42

new southern blacks uh as to the chinese

2:47

or the asian population the asian population was concentrated

2:52

elsewhere primarily in downtown los angeles so the very little mixture

2:58

between the asians and the native whites and the new blacks who

3:05

were moving into the area in great numbers well back in 34

3:11

uh as far as a hollywood connection i recall that

3:16

uh i was at that time just graduating from college

3:22

and i had been hired as a delivery boy in a way

3:28

to deliver materials to the studios

3:34

the studios were quite popular of course and my job was

3:39

to deliver to the studios copies of

3:45

acting bits so that the directors could choose a particular character for a particular

3:52

scene and it was a very exciting

3:58

thing for me beside being a job of course that i had an opportunity to go in and out of

4:05

the studios the studios were quite uh discriminatory in a way

4:11

very few blacks were in roles at that time there were one or two

4:18

uh blacks including one outstanding one clarence muse who's a semi director

4:25

and a actor who acted subparts but

4:30

primarily as the best parts were in my opinion not of the

4:37

ideal type the step and fetch it type of acting where

4:42

some humor was provided or they needed some person to act as a servant to one of the

4:48

stars of that time i was not too excited about

4:53

the role of minorities in hollywood at the time

4:59

and i thought that primarily the image that was conveyed of minorities

5:05

in the movies reflected really a a

5:13

a slavery type that is a plantation type and that that did not

5:20

really give us in my opinion any uplift in the community or nationwide

5:28

that blacks were beginning to get into the mainstream of american life was just

5:33

the opposite was pretty obvious that as i was describing hollywood at that time

5:39

it did not to me come across as portraying the type of roles that i thought should

5:46

be portrayed it was ill attempt of the menstrual days of

5:53

if a character happened to be of a prominent type

5:59

it was a white person blackened to make to be

6:05

made into a black in order to portray a role so that we did not have at that time the

6:11

entrance of the lena horne type of a white complexion uh black person

6:19

and uh the the carryover of prejudice and discrimination one must remember

6:26

that california was not at that time a very progressive state there was great discrimination primarily

6:32

against the chinese against the filipino and later against the japanese

6:39

and across the main streets of los angeles one could as one walk down them

6:46

see signs in the windows no colored persons allowed

6:52

we do not cater to to blacks and that was quite quite

6:58

prominent so that bigotry was very heavily displayed in hollywood it

7:03

reflected the times when i had an opportunity to go on a lot

7:10

of times we didn't let me indicate that

7:15

as far as the theaters were concerned there was no discrimination in the theaters that is

7:21

blacks were not confined to the so-called peanut gallery but

7:26

the movies obviously were just beginning to change

7:32

it was very exciting because we could see the first uh

7:37

sound pictures the new technology was just beginning to come through

7:43

al jolson type in the movies was quite an exciting experience and al jolson of

7:50

course was again portrayed the type of a white person blackened up in order

7:56

to provide entertainment and that was quite extensive uh

8:02

the the movies were not uh from an artistic point of view the very best

8:08

but they were a source of enjoyment and a new technology and along with

8:16

the radio which was coming into prominence about that time

8:21

it was exciting new experience for all of us uh i made a

8:28

little uh radio sets on the side as in order to pick up a little extra

8:35

money and we had a little crystal set little rock

8:40

what we call a crystal set and earphones so we're talking about a very very crude

8:46

technologically age the question of whether or not one

8:53

identifies with a a film that seems foreign to that

8:59

individual's culture is a rather exciting one i

9:04

would say that the films of that particular period

9:10

and i'm talking about the 30s uh were more or less looked at from an artistic point of view you you weren't

9:18

really judging it critically philosophically but you went there for entertainment and

9:24

that's about what you got uh as to whether or not it was actually portraying something it was so

9:31

exciting as a new experience that i suspect that one would overlook the

9:36

ideological aspects of it and while it did not portray let us say

9:43

black america as black america was or as we had hoped that it would become was

9:50

not really the the in important thing at that time uh later we became more critical

9:57

of entertainment as such because we could see that it was shaping

10:03

the image of people and influencing uh politically and socially

10:10

american life but in the early days we were thrilled really to see something on

10:15

the screen at the beginning one had very little

10:23

uh thought of the tremendous influence that hollywood would have on

10:30

america and on on the world for that matter uh it was

10:35

seen from a technological point of view uh and uh the acting was the charles

10:42

chaplin type that is you looked at it as a person who's a good actor good actress and so

10:48

on uh it was later that we discovered that not only was acting

10:55

entertainment but that it was also politically motivated that it was

11:01

a means of shaping things uh shaping our lives

11:07

creating lasting influences on people and then it

11:13

became rather controversial and i guess this led to the later

11:22

inquisition in which liberal writers and liberal actors were somehow

11:29

ostracized by hollywood because they were beginning to change american life but at the earlier period of time

11:37

and that was not so the motion picture industry from the viewpoint of employment

11:42

of minorities was not a great source i would say there will be many more

11:48

blacks employed as as caterers on location or

11:54

let us say in more or less the lesser

12:00

occupations custodians preparing actors

12:07

for different scenes of that nature but and as chauffeurs and so on

12:13

so that was only indirect employment that it was not a major source of

12:18

employment for minorities as a matter of fact for even in the case of dramas where

12:26

uh mexican actors were supposed to be featured many times they were not mexican so it

12:34

was not just black it was a cultural

12:39

bias that extended across the spectrum

12:44

the question has sometimes risen that

12:51

why did i uh in a sense become a democrat

12:56

in an area that was highly republican at that time

13:02

and in the 1930s the area that i lived in and that i

13:08

represented lately in congress and earlier in the

13:13

legislative branch of state government uh was just beginning to change

13:19

the the greatest influence i would say at that time

13:24

on myself was that i had struggled to get through school to

13:32

go to college only to find out that i had no better opportunity than

13:38

than one who hadn't gone to school at all and

13:43

to me the situation was that republicanism

13:48

was obsolete for blacks blacks were still republican merely because

13:54

it was a party that had presumably freed the blacks

14:00

out of and and brought them out of slavery but they were being starved to death under the hoover policies of that day

14:08

president hoover uh uh in a sense

14:13

drove blacks out of the republican party into the democratic ranks but that was

14:18

just beginning when i when i decided that i was a candidate for office

14:27

my influence came through my mother who was a democrat and wondered why my dad

14:33

who had lost all of his money in banks closing under the hoover administration

14:40

and when we were thrown without employment and and as a family i had to depend on

14:46

surplus foods and so forth she couldn't understand it and so she shamed my dad

14:52

into becoming a democrat but in a sense she started me out as a

14:59

democrat and uh when i ran for office i ran as a democrat

15:06

during this time there were many erratics i would say in terms of

15:13

departures from normal living in california in that period of time

15:20

that is throughout the 30s we had various movements we had the so-called

15:26

towns and movement to give everyone 200 a month

15:32

and we had the ham and eggs proposition that every thursday everybody was going to

15:37

get a certain sum of money nobody ever asked how these things would be financed

15:44

but they were dreams that people dreamed because times were tough

15:49

hugh long was doing the same thing in the state of louisiana and in california

15:55

we had the rise of an arthur upton sinclair

16:01

he was in effect a socialist and viewed as a socialist not as a democrat

16:07

and was not really accepted in the democratic party but he was a great influence on politics of that day

16:15

and obviously he became the democratic nominee because

16:21

the rest of the democratic candidates were too conservative and too republican-like to make a difference so

16:29

often sinclair really upset the politics of the state and brought on a great uh

16:36

opposition of all of the forces throughout the state uh the established groups the religious

16:43

groups uh the so-called establishment of uh

16:49

the conservative business people and so on and frightened the people so much until

16:56

fortunately or unfortunately depend depending on one's view

17:01

he lost but by sweeping the state with a great movement of that type he did

17:09

get elected a progressive set up in the state that is congressman

17:16

legislative state legislators were primarily elected as a result of this movement

17:23

during the so-called epic movement in california and the

17:29

candidacy of up to sinclair i would conclude that the state was

17:38

shocked and highly motivated in reaction to the type of thing that was done in

17:45

politics at that time utter sinclair was a very believable

17:51

type of individual but he was not a convincing

17:56

politician as such and i think that people were not quite

18:02

ready for the type of statements that were being made and so it was fairly easy

18:09

uh to scapegoat things by uh

18:14

portraying uh upton sinclair as a communist

18:19

or even beyond being a socialist uh and uh people were not quite ready

18:25

for change the minorities who had recently made some gains

18:33

were obviously conservative in trying to to protect those those gains the the

18:40

the role of the minister in certain communities

18:46

was a great influence and by and large

18:51

the organized church's organized religion was heavily against

18:57

ups and sinclair so that was a real force throughout the state

19:03

but the type of things that were circulated is hardly

19:09

believable there was a the whole

19:14

idea of the state was that if upton sinclair was elected

19:19

that california would almost sink into the ocean and i think the propaganda was such that

19:26

eventually it was just too too much to overcome

19:32

there are those who say also that some of the elections uh

19:39

were manipulated in certain areas and i wouldn't doubt at all

19:44

that uh ballot boxes were changed in conservative areas where they could get away with it

19:50

there was a determination that upton sinclair was not going to be allowed to win

19:57

and he didn't but the fortunate part of it was that a lot of good people

20:03

uh rather liberal forward-looking people were elected at that time recall that

20:10

that culvert olson became governor later because he was elected a state senator

20:18

in the sinclair landslide and he built on that and became governor of the state and proved to be a good

20:24

governor in the period of the mid 30s

20:29

when minorities were beginning to get a toehold on the state

20:36

in terms of political office in terms of breaking down discrimination

20:42

in the unions when they were beginning to become

20:47

[Music] judges for the first time and to be integrated into the postal

20:55

service that they were in a sense becoming middle class

21:03

and as such we had a movement that uh blacks are becoming

21:09

more conservative politically and not the type but they they were

21:16

getting a piece of the action and they wanted to protect it and i suspect that many

21:21

uh just becoming a part of the middle class also

21:27

did not enter into the epic movement as such professionals tended not to be

21:35

supporters of the epic movement i recall that my own brother was a

21:40

practicing physician and to him erton sinclair

21:46

favored socialized medicine and i recall that i

21:52

uh went into one of the sinclair headquarters invited to give my own views because i was a

21:59

candidate i indicated that i

22:04

favored a prepaid health insurance but not the socialization of medicine and i

22:10

recall as a result of that i was not supported not endorsed by the epic movement and the primaries after i won

22:17

my primary in the final analysis i was a part of the democratic ticket

22:23

but not in the primary and i think that illustrates the conservative trend that was

22:29

developing at that time for all of those who became democratic nominees were a

22:34

part of the so-called epic ticket in the general election

22:40

and that is the way it came about i was not opposed to the sinclair movement i

22:46

just did not take a real position on it and as i say because of one or two

22:52

issues that i had expressed myself on

22:59

i was not endorsed by upton sinclair in my primary election

23:06

as to whether or not uh um blacks as such

23:12

responded to the up to upton sinclair movement i would say that it was very

23:18

very lukewarm they were just becoming democrats and i think that change was fast enough for

23:26

them for most of them and they weren't about to change from the republican party to the democratic

23:31

party and then overnight they become allied with what was termed a socialist

23:38

movement it was just too shockingly quick i think that in the final analysis

23:46

they voted for the sinclair ticket in the general election but that's

23:52

because they were then becoming strong democrats and their economic conditions made them

24:00

more allied with the new party even though sinclair

24:05

was a part of it than with the older party and consequently i would say that the

24:12

support of sinclair in the black community was lukewarm uh the ministers who exercised quite an

24:19

influence were not pro sinclair

24:24

whether you can phrase it as being anti-sinclair

24:30

i would not go that far i would say that they were

24:35

supporters of the democratic ticket and more amount of splitting that ticket

24:40

than it was a matter of being strongly anti-sinclair

24:47

the black community has never been really scared by socialism and i'm not trying to identify

24:54

necessarily their voting for against the epic movement on the

24:59

basis of the fear of socialism well let me

25:05

state in terms of that particular time and the politics of that particular

25:11

time it was not a separate movement and such but we had several movements

25:17

that coincided uh blacks as such were not

25:22

attracted to the epic movement as such they were never a strong part of it the

25:28

leaders were not let us say involved in the movement

25:34

the movement had very very few minority leaders as such as a part of

25:40

the epic movement but blacks were changing they were becoming democrats

25:46

and the election was not only a an election that featured upton

25:51

sinclair but it featured a lot of other candidates including myself for for example as a democrat

25:58

and i was running as a as a democrat who happened obviously to be on a ticket with mr

26:05

sinclair in the runoff during the epic movement in california

26:12

let me make it clear that i was not actually running as an epic

26:18

candidate i was never a strong epic and no

26:23

particular reason i had no ideological uh objection to most of the program

26:31

i was however a democrat a new new democrat who was running as a democratic

26:37

candidate it was tough for me to convince many of my friends and supporters

26:43

as a democrat that that was the right thing to do but i just happened to be a democrat and i ran

26:50

as a democrat and while i disagreed with one or two things in the epic movement it doesn't

26:57

say it doesn't mean that i was opposed to the whole idea of

27:02

changing things across the state there were many things that needed changing and so it just happened we just happened

27:09

to converge i think one was put into proper perspective

27:14

that that was not the only thing that was happening particularly in the minority community

27:21

minorities was just beginning to break through many barriers

27:27

in those days we had a terrific time to get a black judge uh

27:34

elected the first one in the state uh the first supervisor in in the post office the first woman uh in

27:42

black woman in the post office and so forth now all of these things were happening at the

27:47

same time that the epic movement was happening and so it was not a monolithic

27:52

a monolithic community it was a community that was undergoing a great transition and as such

28:00

the uh uh people i think i think a majority did vote uh democratic and

28:06

consequently uh for the epic ticket and so that the two coincided rather than

28:13

one being the cause of the other during the the epic campaign i i think that

28:19

most of us do recall uh the tremendous pressure that was put on everybody

28:25

throughout the state to oppose uh

28:31

upton sinclair at least the top of the ticket and i recall that

28:37

in business after business throughout industry employers would call their

28:44

employees in just before the election and would tell them now look if upton sinclair is

28:51

elected you're not going to have a job i can recall that in many households

28:58

blacks who were in household service and that was a great number of them we're told now look if mr sinclair is elected

29:07

i won't be able to hire you to continue in employment and that type of pressure

29:13

was throughout the state and that was a tremendous

29:18

disincentive to vote for the top of the ticket

29:24

for a long time african americans were not

29:31

were not the ones who enjoyed the government benefits they

29:37

had been denied this in the deep south and even in the north and and also in

29:44

the west the idea of the government helping them was somewhat foreign

29:50

in 1935 when the social security act was passed i think one must remember that

29:57

the act included not only protection for the elderly but it also

30:03

began uh protection for children for the first time child aid became a reality

30:10

and that was an important part of the act for blacks

30:16

and the act also provided

30:21

help for the disabled and led also to such later programs in

30:26

medicare medicaid and whatnot and these were tremendous benefits to the black

30:32

community which had been denied them even when they were offered to others

30:38

but for the first time everyone enjoyed the benefits of something under the social security act

30:45

and i think that that to blacks it was a great lifesaver

30:52

it's pretty difficult to visualize what uh type of security people didn't have in

30:58

those days instead of social security the elderly were confined to uh what we call then

31:07

the poor houses uh it was uh uh places set aside for the

31:12

elderly where they were in a sense incarcerated in a poor house when they became

31:19

elderly the mental and the mental cases were were actually locked up

31:24

uh those who did not have families

31:30

with the adoption of social security in 1935

31:35

to black americans is almost like the emancipation proclamation something comparable

31:40

or something like the magna carta and the english tradition for the first time blacks considered

31:47

themselves having something which others had and which was guaranteed to them which they

31:54

could not be denied everything that that happened that was good

32:01

uh was somehow denied to uh african americans uh but uh under

32:07

the social security act uh there was no such distinction made and so it was a real breakthrough

32:14

that to them it simply mean meant at that time

32:20

that as they grew older they knew that they would gain this as a matter of right they knew

32:26

that their children under child care which later became the uh afdc

32:33

and medicaid and so forth they knew that this was an opportunity that they could

32:40

pass on to the next generation so it was revolutionary and a great uh great day

32:46

not only in american life but i think an outstanding day similar to the emancipation proclamation among african

32:54

americans at first obviously

32:59

there was this omission that was the omission of domestic workers but

33:05

that that was soon repaired and on the state level we moved to do it

33:11

we moved to get those benefits for domestics on the state level but at that time and

33:19

later obviously domestic service was not as important to

33:24

blacks as other occupations and

33:30

we're getting sort of anticipating a later period when

33:35

domestic service was no longer the major activity or the source of income for

33:41

black americans in 1934 we

33:48

in the state were highly involved in civil rights i would say that we had a civil

33:54

rights movement prior to the year one in the 60s

34:00

i have indicated that there were signs throughout the state

34:07

that indicated that blacks were not welcome in places of public accommodation

34:16

traveling was a problem at first it was directed against the

34:21

chinese orientals who could not ride streetcars in some

34:27

places throughout the state and

34:32

at that time we moved to strengthen our civil rights act we had a civil rights act in california quite early but it was

34:39

not very strong and it was very poorly enforced so we moved to strengthen that

34:45

and i would say that in the period from about 30

34:51

2 to about 40 that the great impetus was in strengthening

34:58

the civil rights act we were not as much concerned with other issues as we were with one great issue

35:05

of civil rights it was my personal hope that as a member of the state legislature we

35:11

could strengthen the act so that we could in effect

35:18

allow minorities to ride undisturbed on streetcars to testify in

35:25

the courts where white persons were concerned in order to break down

35:32

segregation in the schools the schools were highly segregated and also

35:38

we were just starting out to

35:43

strengthen the law which would protect minorities against restrictive covenants

35:49

they couldn't buy in certain neighborhoods because they were restricted i'm often asked

35:55

what motivated me to run for a public office at that time to run

36:00

for the state assembly one i think has to put it into proper

36:06

perspective in the state of california we had one

36:11

official one african american elected official

36:16

and that official happened to come from our community

36:22

the the individual was very conservative he died in the world republican

36:30

who did not really do very much in terms of the needs of the people

36:37

was not concerned about jobs and housing and civil rights and so forth

36:42

but merely because he was black was supported rather

36:48

with great pride by a community that felt that that

36:53

was the only official we had he's ours and we've got to elect him and so a group of us young people having

37:01

graduated from college and without jobs uh

37:06

felt that uh that indicated to the

37:12

to the state and to all forces throughout the state that we were not

37:18

really uh meaningful we had no power we had a had

37:23

a voice that didn't speak for us and so we decided that that individual had to be defeated in order

37:30

to turn things around uh and we supported a candidate in 1932

37:38

in order to defeat that individual the candidate lost because the candidate had really been

37:43

put in by the opposition and so we decided that among this little group of young people

37:51

that we had to put one of our own up and i happened to be selected by that group

37:57

and supported and for that reason uh i ran and happened to be elected in

38:04

that election near the end of the decade of the 30s.


38:09

there was a reaction to the new deal programs

38:14

business interests that had really profited under the new deal

38:21

decided that that it was too revolutionary that in

38:26

some way various activities would be nationalized

38:33

or that the so-called private enterprise would be

38:39

somewhat diminished by national regulations and

38:46

social programs a recession developed that and

38:52

we began to see unemployment again that we had escaped a decade earlier

39:00

and as a result of that the new deal was hard pressed

39:06

to think of new programs mr roosevelt

39:12

persisted however and at first there was an attempt to

39:17

balance the budget when that failed failed to produce the type of economic

39:22

activity that was needed to put people to work mr roosevelt just thought of new

39:27

agencies and kept thinking of new agencies to put people to work to provide for those who were in

39:34

hardship or distressed and so we began to see again

39:39

some of the agencies that were earlier created such as an extension of the

39:45

works progress administration the public works administration and so on and so

39:52

instead of having people idle go on a dole um they we had new agencies

39:58

that created jobs building bridges preparing

40:04

buildings that needed preparing the concept being that they had put

40:09

people to work doing that which would not compete with the private sector.






 all of the activity that i've indicated

40:16

that was happening on the national scene was duplicated on a smaller scale within

40:22

the state the state was beginning to develop some huge

40:28

projects which did employ people.


 we had to go over to the colorado river

40:34

to get water so that we had to build a transmission line that employed a large number of

40:40

individuals we had to go 300 miles to the high sierras to get a water supply

40:46

for the city so the metropolitan water district became a most important

40:51

thing for the development of southern california and so in terms of

40:56

building flood control getting a water supply irrigating the farms of the various

41:04

valleys individuals were employed and this was a type of work which

41:09

gradually we got minorities into prior to that time many had been sent over the

41:15

mountains what we call the mountains with the ridge route to san francisco in order to pick cotton in the valley

41:22

that was a temporary type of of work harvesting the crops

41:30

thought the the projects were primarily supported by

41:35

taxpayers money the metropolitan water district consisted not only of los angeles but

41:40

every small town in southern california needed a water supply so so the money came from bond

41:47

issues and from the people taxing themselves in order to support them the uh

41:54

the generation of power from the colorado river the old boulder dam

41:59

project as was earlier called was federally supported but it was a

42:05

a regional project localized primarily in california which

42:11

needed the the power more than any of the other states in the southwest but indirectly it was such

42:19

projects as this that kept the people employed as the

42:25

as the work project idea uh became somewhat obsolete i didn't

42:33

employ enough people we began anticipating the arming of the country

42:42

for the uh what became world war ii and so uh

42:47

along with uh uh with such international episodes is mussolini going into ethiopia

42:54

the germans going into uh czechoslovakia and so forth

43:00

there was a great amount of activity started in california because of its

43:05

climate uh in in in preparing for a defense posture

43:13

and that began to employ people and while it was accelerated much more later

43:21

it started about 30 35 between 35 and 40 1940.

43:28

in california we never really marked the close of the new deal

43:33

i would say that we suffered less than the rest of the country

43:38

uh california was a progressive state is much more progressive than even now

43:45

and we were moving ahead in order to anticipate

43:51

and increase prosperity we were beginning through our universities through

43:57

california technology through a stanford university california system

44:04

and such universities to develop outstanding

44:10

products and actually we were on the ver we saw the verge of

44:15

growing technology and in many places we were

44:21

quite advanced now i'm not saying that that kept up but at that time with respect to the rest of

44:28

the country we were doing extremely well agriculture was

44:33

was highly productive we had mechanized reforms we had specialty crops

44:40

and i would say it was to a long time of a leading industry

44:45

the the of course the war effort was more highly developed

44:52

in the 40s rather than in the decade of the 30s but our defense

44:58

industries were developed and in shipbuilding aircraft and and

45:07

allied industries we were ahead of the rest of the country

0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿