bit later i'd like to ask professor
mariana matt sucato who holds the chair
in
economics of innovation and public value
at the university
college london here and uh marianna you
also are a special advisor for the
european
commission on research science and
innovation
so just give us some opening thoughts
you are renowned for
rethinking the role of public policy in
shaping both the rate of growth and its
directions so within the context of
external finance
what can we do where's the money going
to come from sure
M:
so i think first it's important to
recognize that
actually there's never really been a
lack of finance
it's what finance has been doing and
where it's been going
and so that whole question of the
direction of finance i think is key
in the financial crisis there was huge
amounts of trillions were poured into
the system
most of that actually ended up back in
the financial system itself
and this is true in many countries like
where i'm sitting today in the uk
only one pound out of every 10 that the
private banking system puts into the
system actually even goes to the real
economy
the rest goes to fire fi finance
insurance and real estate
and so really the question is how can we
also make sure that central banks
themselves
start focusing just as much on the
allocation of credit
rather than this need just for more
liquidity and
the other point is really you know again
lots of finance but the type of finance
is
often problematic in both developing and
developed countries there's plenty of
inpatient finance
what you actually need to really spur
development but also
innovation and investment-led growth is
more patient
long-term committed finance and that's
the kind of finance that actually often
does come
from different types of development
banking institutions but there too
i would say you know kind of a third
problem is sometimes with those
institutions
we've sort of lost the opportunity to
create stronger conditionality
and so you know if we want to take the
sustainable development goals seriously
kind of walk the talk about those really
ambitious goals the 169 targets
beneath them we really need much more
conditionality in the way that
governments and different transnational
uh financial institutions provide that
finance and so i think what's really
curious right now with covid
is that we're waking up to this in some
countries in denmark by the way they've
refused to give
bailouts to companies that use tax
havens in france the bailout that was
provided to both renault
and air france was based on commitments
towards lower carbon emissions of those
sectors
and in the u.s you might know that
another fantastic woman
elizabeth warren has been talking about
conditionalities on value extraction
kind of lowering the amount of profits
that are being used simply for things
like share buybacks
as a condition for again the funds that
are coming from government
so
that really requires also aligning the
way we think about finance and the role
of finance with really
industrial strategy and it's also quite
useful that industrial strategy is back
after decades of being almost a
blasphemy but it's not enough to think
about industrial strategies like picking
sectors or types of firms
it really
should be about
industrial transformation and you know
across all sectors and this
role that public financial institutions
can play in creating conditions
for industrial transformation even in
old sectors like steel
is key and just one quick example of how
that happened in some recent years in
germany
instead of a public bank just kind of
handing out money to the steel sector
and steel is a sector that does tend to
ask for money there's conditions
attached in germany for steel to reduce
its material content
to repurpose reuse and recycle the way
they did it was up to them so that can
spur innovation
but that conditionality is really what
we need to properly get what people call
stakeholder
capitalism stakeholder governance and
today the german steel industry
is innovative not because it woke up one
day and said we need to be more
stakeholder
driven but there was conditions attached
to the finance they received.
V:
thank you very much.
let me go to
professor stephanie kelton
um from stony brook university who's
written a book on
modern monetary theory a new approach to
economics and you just be taking the
world by stormer stephanie and your
most recent book which is out um just
now the deficit
myth modern monetary theory and the
birth of the people's economy is already
on its way to becoming
a bestseller and you very much challenge
existing thinking on
economic policy so just picking up on
what various song we said sir
do you go along with that?
K:
i do
i i loved those remarks in fact i think
that
you know this idea that um somehow
we're doing all we can to assist
developing countries
um by providing them a
a way a vehicle primarily through
exports through which they can
earn a foreign currency very often the
us dollar
which they then turn around and hand
over to creditors in service of
perpetual debt.
and i think that was her
point so that
we are not doing i think what we ought
to be doing
to help developing countries actually
get out of the developing country
status and uh.
and so what would
some of those things look like i think
the us can play a very important role
here and must in fact uh as a
leader we can act as a global leader in
terms of
the way that we participate in creating
and reforming trade arrangements.
we can
help set standards um in deals
that help that we help craft like you
know we can demand stricter ecological
standards.
we can ensure that there are robust
labor protections
we can share with developing countries
green technologies and
intellectual property we can help poor
nations
develop food and energy security,
so that
they aren't
dependent upon the rest of the world for
critical imports of
medicines technologies food and energy
uh.
and i and i think the providing
financing is part of
what needs to be done.
but there are also
um
non-financial commitments that the
developed world
can and i think needs to um
make to the rest of the world.
um i could
go on for quite a bit longer i know you
have a lot of
other voices important voices that we
need to hear from but
for just a few ideas.
V:
to stephanie kelton
stephanie
we heard minoosh there uh talk about the
fact that um
richer countries have taken massive
unorthodox measures uh you know when
we're talking within this context of
debt but i just repeat what ken
foreign the finance minister of ghana
has said whilst the richer countries are
doing that
african countries are expected to play
by the rules
so do we need a rewriting of the debt
rules.
K:
i i think that transfers are better than
loans
and i think that this trapping
developing countries
on a treadmill of perpetual debt and
debt
service.
um you know we have
the results we've got decades upon
decades of results we
end up with countries that are never
permitted
to fully develop.
and so
when and i think it's important to to
recognize a couple of things.
one is
that there are um some developing
countries that have
more fiscal capacity than others.
um the more dependent you are i
mentioned this a little while ago the
more dependent you are on the rest of
the world for critical
imports energy food medicines technology
the more likely it is that you are going
to end up in a
one of these treadmill situations where
you're forced to borrow in foreign
currency.
and then you have difficulties as
interest rates rise it becomes more and
more difficult to service those debts
then you end up at the imf
then you end up with more debt over time
and
and struggling to either grow your way
out of it or take one of these
alternative
um measures you know inflating the debt
away and and so forth and so
what i think is so critically important
is that we
recognize that you know madame lagarde
said
this is an all hands on deck situation.
and we
are fighting a common enemy right now
it's not like world war
ii when we fought one another we are
fighting a common enemy.
and and yet we need something i think
akin to a marshall plan.
we need
the the stronger countries the developed
world to step forward
and to provide the aid and assistance.
and
um and help these other countries along
because you know i don't want to
end up in a situation where we've got a
divided world and we've got developed
and developing countries and the
developing countries look the same as
they did
10 and 20 and 30 and 50 years ago as we
move.
you know uh forward in time i don't want
to look back in 30 years and see the
same
group of developing countries still in a
developing country status.
so um you know i think uh
i'll i'll stop with that i think aid is
critically important and i think we
should start to shift away from this
model
where we continue lending as the primary
means of trying to provide aid and
assistance there are
real ways that we can help countries
rather than constantly thinking in
financial terms we've got to do it with
real resources.
V:
let's go to mariana
mariana your views on
debt briefly
M:
sure i mean one thing which
i think we all know but it's just good
to say that even though we talk about
public debt the real problem right now
is private debt
that's what actually caused the
financial crisis and in many countries
like the uk its private debt to
disposable income
is actually back at record levels
literally to the extent that it was
just before the crisis and unfortunately
with some of the coveted relief
because it hasn't actually been about
debt relief but just delaying
you know mortgage payments for example
that's actually just going to make this
problem even worse
furthermore because real wages have not
been rising many people have actually
been taking out increasing amounts of
debt just to retain their existing
living standards
so until both those questions of real
wages are taken on board
um you know that's not gonna be solved
but also in a country like where i'm
from italy
you know again people talk about public
debt but the deficit the actual deficit
in italy has actually been relatively
modest
debt to gdp has been rising why because
the denominator has not been rising
why because they haven't actually been
spending and investing in all the
strategic areas
like human capital formation education
research and development
which are long run drivers of growth.
so
instead of having conditionality
attached to lowering deficits which
unfortunately in europe
we've had and still have there should
actually be conditionality on investing
and all those drivers of long-run growth
and you know that would completely
change the conversation.
V:
let me go to you.
stephanie kelton if
you're there please
just a quick final comment from you.
K: 11:05
well okay so i think that you know one
thing to keep in mind
is that exports are a real
cost and imports are a real benefit
and so when vera's talking about the
export
uh the exportation of of rubber from the
continent.
and saying now we don't have the ability
we can't get rubber gloves
your exports are your real cost and it
isn't to say that
trade is not beneficial and there cannot
be gains and benefits to countries
through
trade but you just have to be very
careful are you orienting your economy
around production for the sake of export
for the sake of earning a currency that
you need
in order primarily to service debt and
so when we're talking about you know
safety nets
and and transfers i think that what vera
is
is getting at here is that the safety
net is really for the creditors.
that's what the safety net is for the
safety net is there to ensure that the
dollars continue to flow so that they
can be recycled
and returned to the hands of the
creditors.
so i'll stop there.
V:
mariana matsukato your brief closing
remarks one minute starts now
i mean.
M:
one of the issues is how do we
govern trade and so i mean
the most obvious misgovernance of this
is around healthcare
and healthcare products so how
intellectual property rights
are abused i mean um you know vaccines
right now yes there's a race for the
covert of vaccine but unless we make
sure
as the wh is arguing that we need a
common patent pool
then actually we're going to see the
same kind of rent seeking which vera was
talking about
and by the way just this week we've
learned that jillian is going to be
charging
3120 for its coveted drug
remembers veer.
and that drug was
actually developed largely
by the u.s taxpayer so 70 million uh us
dollars went to that and the fact that
even though we all talk about public
investment if we can't then govern
that investment to actually achieve
inclusive and sustainable growth
it's a massive failure.
and lastly don't
forget that adam smith when he talked
about the free market
he met free from rent.
and you know all
this intermediation that vera is talking
about is rent.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿